It was a historical throwback and makes it execute slower.

Most of what fusebox is can be summarised as follows:
<cfset temp = structappend(attributes,form)>
<cfset temp = structappend(attributes,url)>

and try and put all your code in one file :P

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Snake Hollywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 February 2004 13:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] cfstandards...coming soon!
>
>
> One thing I always wondered, why all that code that checks which
> version of
> CF it's running on, surely this is pointless?
> Your not gonna write an app on CFMX and then deploy it on CF4.5, and all
> those version checks wont stop the developer using tags and functions
> specific to a version of  CF.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon Horwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 04 February 2004 12:46
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] cfstandards...coming soon!
> >
> >
> > Three remarks/replies:
> >
> > "As to fusebox and obfusctating the design. To be honest shit
> > coder in, shit code out. Makes no difference what they do it in." -
> >
> > yes, but Fusebox doesn't encourage people to become better
> > developers.  If anything, It makes it easier for them to "get
> > by" with little skill for longer.
> >
> > "it is overkill and I avoid like the plague" -
> >
> > me too
> >
> > "it does have it's uses" -
> >
> > like lining a bird cage?  Seriously, though - you're right.
> > In an environment where standardization is important and the
> > developers don't have the skills to use best practices,
> > follow development guidlines, or write 'complex'
> > functionality on their own, it does have merit.
> >
> > ~Simon
> >
> >
> >
> > Simon Horwith
> > CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
> > Member of Team Macromedia
> > Macromedia Certified Instructor
> > Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
> > Certified Flash MX Developer
> > CFDJList - List Administrator
> > http://www.how2cf.com/
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adam Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 04 February 2004 12:43
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] cfstandards...coming soon!
> >
> >
> > I'd go with the fact once you setup whichever version of
> > fusebox you want to play with on your machine, then deploy it
> > onto a server. You forget the behind the scenes stuff you
> > have setup to do some of the fusebox stuff.
> >
> > Suddenly it's the host's fault that something ain't running
> > right cos it works fine on *my* machine.
> >
> > Russ, I do think you should be charging for this, which I
> > hope you are!
> >
> > As to fusebox and obfusctating the design. To be honest shit
> > coder in, shit code out. Makes no difference what they do it
> > in. Unfortunately FB does not help if somebody is doing some
> > amazingly awful coding. It will make it worse from a
> > maintenance point of view.
> >
> > Personally I like FB. Coming from a Software Engineering
> > background (if you ever fly, I was part of the team that
> > wrote the NERC aircraft collision detection system that
> > covers most of the south east commercial traffic) it gave me
> > an event driven model for web applications which lent itself
> > to taking the product of requirements analysis all the way
> > through to writing test harnesses.
> >
> > It depends on why you are using it. I do find in many cases
> > it is overkill and I avoid like the plague, but should you
> > get into a set of requirements that are into more than a
> > couple of pages...it does have it's uses.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 04 February 2004 10:36
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] cfstandards...coming soon!
> > >
> > >
> > > Coming in late here...
> > >
> > > But just to clarify, Russ are you saying that you're finding more
> > > bugs/errors in fusebox applications in comparison to non-fusebox
> > > applications or just pointing out that its harder to debug
> > a Fusebox
> > > application than a non-fusebox application (for a non fuseboxer)?
> > >
> > > Kola
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> >
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> >
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> --
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>




-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to