[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16176578#comment-16176578
]
Cassandra Targett commented on SOLR-10912:
------------------------------------------
bq. If doc updates are not (yet) present then it might also be nice for the
tool to try and point towards which parts of the documentation might need
changing. E.g. if the patch changes the {{ReplicationHandler.java}} class, the
word {{ReplicationHandler}} appears currently in three *.adoc files and the
tool could just mention them: implicit-requesthandlers.adoc
index-replication.adoc making-and-restoring-backups.adoc
+1, I like that idea.
> Adding automatic patch validation
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10912
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10912
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: Build
> Reporter: Mano Kovacs
> Attachments: SOLR-10912.sample-patch.patch,
> SOLR-10912.solj-contrib-facet-error.patch
>
>
> Proposing introduction of automated patch validation, similar what Hadoop or
> other Apache projects are using (see link). This would ensure that every
> patch passes a certain set of criterions before getting approved. It would
> save time for developer (faster feedback loop), save time for committers
> (less step to do manually), and would increase quality.
> Hadoop is currently using Apache Yetus to run validations, which seems to be
> a good direction to start. This jira could be the board of discussing the
> preferred solution.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
