[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16189738#comment-16189738
 ] 

Mano Kovacs commented on SOLR-10912:
------------------------------------

As you can see from the last comment above, the minimal setup is getting ready.
Steps remaining:
* Multiple module test currently duplicates the failed test result, fixing 
shortly.
* Add test to call {{-validate-source-patterns}}
* Finalize the runner script to setup Yetus, similarly to Hadoop.
* Verify the test-patch with Github PR
* Add Patch Available status for SOLR project (and update the script to look 
for that). [~steve_rowe], regarding to our IRL conversation, could you help me 
with adding that status in JIRA?
* Add {{Precommit-SOLR}} and {{Precommit-LUCENE}} jenkins jobs

Open questions:
# As you can see, a patch with two log entries had 6 (flaky) test failures. 
Assuming flaky tests will not go away very soon, would it still be useful to 
have this test-patch? 
# I propose starting with the smallest set of tests (ie. affected modules) and 
extend them later to dependent modules. 

> Adding automatic patch validation
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10912
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10912
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: Build
>            Reporter: Mano Kovacs
>         Attachments: SOLR-10912.ok-patch-in-core.patch, 
> SOLR-10912.sample-patch.patch, SOLR-10912.solj-contrib-facet-error.patch
>
>
> Proposing introduction of automated patch validation, similar what Hadoop or 
> other Apache projects are using (see link). This would ensure that every 
> patch passes a certain set of criterions before getting approved. It would 
> save time for developer (faster feedback loop), save time for committers 
> (less step to do manually), and would increase quality.
> Hadoop is currently using Apache Yetus to run validations, which seems to be 
> a good direction to start. This jira could be the board of discussing the 
> preferred solution.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to