My opinion may not have much weight since a) I didn't contribute to this release and b) I didn't take time to verify this release.. but the Apache Way is what defines our project, and the voting process is integral to that.
That's not a very convincing vote objectively, but passing by default should be our response to a lackluster voting response. Since we're so far behind on delivery schedule, I say, +1 to release. Thanks, Troy On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected]>wrote: > So it's been more than 72 hours, we've technically had 3 +1's (myself, > Itamar and Simon). then Itamar to nit pick said -1 because of a minor > solution issue (which in my opinion doesn't require us to halt the release). > > I'm not particularly confident in our voting record on this one - could > anyone else chime in on the release artifacts? Should I cut a new release? > > Stefan, I know you're a bit busy but could you run ANT? (I think we are > pretty safe here) > > ~Prescott > > ---------------------------------------- > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release > > Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:41:13 -0700 > > > > Alright, it's taken us a bit longer than we expected to get this up to > vote. Thanks for everyone who helped out. This vote will be open for > roughly 72 hours. > > > > +1 - Ready to roll > > 0 - don't care > > -1 - Not ready because... > > > > ~Prescott >
