Hi. I haven't work with the release but have used the alpha release and run all our products unit-test with success result.
So I will also give +1. // Patric On 5 October 2012 07:08, Simon Svensson <[email protected]> wrote: > I've realized from the answers since the first attempt that I have no clue > about any Apache release formats. I can only vote on the general state of > the code and functionality. I'll give it +1 to get it out to public > consumption. > > > On 2012-10-05 05:36, Prescott Nasser wrote: > >> So it's been more than 72 hours, we've technically had 3 +1's (myself, >> Itamar and Simon). then Itamar to nit pick said -1 because of a minor >> solution issue (which in my opinion doesn't require us to halt the release). >> >> I'm not particularly confident in our voting record on this one - could >> anyone else chime in on the release artifacts? Should I cut a new release? >> >> Stefan, I know you're a bit busy but could you run ANT? (I think we are >> pretty safe here) >> >> ~Prescott >> >> ------------------------------**---------- >> >>> From: [email protected] >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release >>> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:41:13 -0700 >>> >>> Alright, it's taken us a bit longer than we expected to get this up to >>> vote. Thanks for everyone who helped out. This vote will be open for >>> roughly 72 hours. >>> >>> +1 - Ready to roll >>> 0 - don't care >>> -1 - Not ready because... >>> >>> ~Prescott >>> >> >
