I will of that tonight / tomorrow Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Christopher Currens Sent: 10/5/2012 2:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
Alright, here are the changes that I made. I think there's enough file changes that we'll want to do another RC, particularly on the source package (sorry Prescott!): -- Added licenses to all .sln files and a few .cs source files where it was missing -- Updated text in CHANGES.txt and README.txt** -- Removed unnecessary files that were used to track the porting process -- Fixed (a ridiculous amount of) problems with the XML doc comments ** For the README.txt, I updated the URLs, although right now they might point to nothing. The documentation urls point to lucenenet.apache.org/docs/3.0.3, which doesn't exist yet. I am assuming that it will when the release passes? I put today's date in for CHANGES.txt I guess it can stay the same or be updated if several days pass between now and the actual release. Additionally, I verified that: -- Runtime versions of each dll, that NET35 was in fact NET35, etc. -- All DLLs were signed w/ snk I would like to verify the nuget packages as well before they are released. I'm thinking that means we'll probably need another vote. The code itself has been approved by everyone it seems (I've been using 3.0.3 since I finished the initial port of core without any issues), we just need to make sure the release artifacts are in the correct format. So, can we cut another release with the nuget packages and _finally_ kick 3.0.3 out of the door? :) Thanks, Christopher On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Laimonas Simutis <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Michael Herndon <[email protected]> > wrote: >> +1 when RAT is finished. I've been using 3.0.3 at work and its been >> solid. >> >> Sent from my Windows Phone >> From: Itamar Syn-Hershko >> Sent: 9/29/2012 12:22 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release >> +1, 3.0.3 is probably even more stable than 2.9.4 at this point. RavenDB >> pre-release is running on it for quite a while now without real issues. >> >> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Kieran Logan <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> 0 - stuck with 2.9.4 for the foreseeable >>> >>> Kieran >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: 29 September 2012 04:41 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release >>> >>> Alright, it's taken us a bit longer than we expected to get this up to >>> vote. >>> Thanks for everyone who helped out. This vote will be open for roughly 72 >>> hours. >>> >>> +1 - Ready to roll >>> 0 - don't care >>> -1 - Not ready because... >>> >>> ~Prescott >>> >>> >>>
