Chalk it up to using expedient tools to pull the team together to ship a major release and to pull in a big contribution after a long wait.
Capturing discussion in a public format and archiving the discussion would be preferable to fragmenting across lists, PR comments, and Slack, but the tools are all valuable, and until we find a way to build a digest for the archives I support using them all. Anyone know what other projects are doing to bring many-threaded conversations into their dev list, if any? On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > Slack isn't the mailing list. > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Andrew Musselman < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > We talked about it a lot, some on Slack; was work finally approved for > > donation. I reviewed it, looked great. > > > > On Wednesday, June 17, 2015, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > 5k lines in a single commit? > > > > > > No discussion on the list? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Andrew Musselman < > > > [email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > Sounds like part of PR 135 which is Dmitriy's 5k-line-diff drop from > > the > > > > other week. > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, June 17, 2015, Ted Dunning <[email protected] > > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > A lot of JIRA's are being opened and then closed with no apparent > > > commits > > > > > associated with them. > > > > > > > > > > For example MAHOUT-1725 adds an element-wise power operation but it > > was > > > > > closed as fixed with no apparent discussion and with no commits > > > attached > > > > to > > > > > the JIRA. > > > > > > > > > > What is happening? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
