Having these discussions in a non-public environment prevents all
non-invited people (e.g. all non-committers) from participating in the
development. I think this is a huge no-go.
Best,
Sebastian
On 18.06.2015 09:43, Ted Dunning wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Andrew Musselman <
[email protected]> wrote:
Capturing discussion in a public format and archiving the discussion would
be preferable to fragmenting across lists, PR comments, and Slack, but the
tools are all valuable, and until we find a way to build a digest for the
archives I support using them all.
Actually, capturing the design discussion on the list is not just
preferable.
It is required.
Using alternative tools is fine and all, but not if it compromises that
core requirement.
