What do you mean no-go, that there's no reasonable way to incorporate discussion from other channels to the list?
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Sebastian <[email protected]> wrote: > Having these discussions in a non-public environment prevents all > non-invited people (e.g. all non-committers) from participating in the > development. I think this is a huge no-go. > > Best, > Sebastian > > > On 18.06.2015 09:43, Ted Dunning wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Andrew Musselman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Capturing discussion in a public format and archiving the discussion >>> would >>> be preferable to fragmenting across lists, PR comments, and Slack, but >>> the >>> tools are all valuable, and until we find a way to build a digest for the >>> archives I support using them all. >>> >>> >> Actually, capturing the design discussion on the list is not just >> preferable. >> >> It is required. >> >> Using alternative tools is fine and all, but not if it compromises that >> core requirement. >> >>
