The ASF mandates that all relevant discussions happen on the mailinglist.
Best,
Sebastian
On 18.06.2015 10:44, Andrew Musselman wrote:
What do you mean no-go, that there's no reasonable way to incorporate
discussion from other channels to the list?
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Sebastian <[email protected]> wrote:
Having these discussions in a non-public environment prevents all
non-invited people (e.g. all non-committers) from participating in the
development. I think this is a huge no-go.
Best,
Sebastian
On 18.06.2015 09:43, Ted Dunning wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Andrew Musselman <
[email protected]> wrote:
Capturing discussion in a public format and archiving the discussion
would
be preferable to fragmenting across lists, PR comments, and Slack, but
the
tools are all valuable, and until we find a way to build a digest for the
archives I support using them all.
Actually, capturing the design discussion on the list is not just
preferable.
It is required.
Using alternative tools is fine and all, but not if it compromises that
core requirement.
