On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:25:27 -0600, Benjamin Horst <[email protected]> wrote:
Even though we already use proprietary applications, I agree that
anything new we implement should strongly prefer open source.
I think both O3Spaces and Alfresco are open source, or have open source
editions, which would be the way for us to go if we did choose one.
Right but you should also read what does this open source editions
actually have. For example:
O3spaces open source edition is just limited to 5 seats. Is really what
some people call them as 'crippleware'. Is open source as long as you have
a tiny organization.
Alfresco also has an enterprise version that is best suited for large
organizations. So I am not saying that they are not trully open source.
But we should read what do they mean and what do they offer (or not) when
using open source editions.
(There may also be others, but these are the two of which I'm aware.)
The primary question is still: Would one of these enhance our ability to
collaborate in developing marketing, art, and other collateral for all
of the subprojects? (I believe it would, but perhaps someone can suggest
a better or easier alternative?)
-Ben
On Dec 30, 2008, at 11:10 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
This is a sweet/sour area. On one point, sure we want to endorse OOo-
ODF related products and have a mutual benefit. On the other side, we
get into the same situation on theLinux kernel system when they had a
proprietary application to manage their code.
Thats what generated GIT as a FLOSS alternative. Althought this said, I
am aware OOo already uses a proprietary application using Collabnet.
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:01:07 -0600, Benjamin Horst <[email protected]>
wrote:
For something akin to version control but more user-friendly, I
suggest we take a look at Alfresco or O3Spaces. Both are open source
enterprise content management systems that compete directly with
Sharepoint, and both have been good friends to OOo in the past.
Maybe one of the companies would be willing to set up and manage a
site for us, in exchange for the obviously-strong promotional benefits
they could get from the donation.
Alfresco: http://www.alfresco.com/
O3Spaces: http://o3spaces.com/
Does anyone have contacts at one of these companies and would be
willing to ask them about it?
-Ben
On Dec 30, 2008, at 7:54 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:18:32 -0600, eric.bachard <[email protected]
> wrote:
Hi Sankarshan :-)
Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 3:16 PM, eric b <[email protected]>
wrote:
Can you please tell us more about the Education flyer ? As
Education
Project co Lead, I'm very interested, to know what such flyer does
contain.
This does bring up a need for having a central repository of such
print-ready material.
Probably, but the first step must be: every subproject proposes
something and then, after agreement, this is put on the central
repository.
Here we read " there is already one .. " and everything made behind
the door. No way to discuss the content nor anything else : it does
not make sense.
Again, this is one of the roles of Education Project to create a
flyer for Education. And if marketing project wants to help, this
will be great to work together.
Sure but this was done before the Education project had any
sustainable ammount of users. Plus this was a marketing goal of
promoting OOo in schools. And you did send an email about it, so you
were aware of the development. I dont have the time to go into
rescuing that email but the flyer was not very good as far as quality
is concern.
Could perhaps be handled via a version control as well (if not
already being done). That way, sub-projects can
perhaps have their own materials ready and waiting for a checkout.
+1 : the idea of use a version control is great : it will bring
readability and maintainability.
VC is hard in OOo, people need SSH/Tunneling rights to access the
site CVS, plus there is already people doing flyers with out version
control working great for them.
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96373
ps: As regards the Mozilla hand-out, I always like a B+W version as
well. Saves a lot on print run costs :)
+1 for the cost
Regards,
Eric Bachard
--Alexandro Colorado
CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES
http://es.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
Benjamin Horst
[email protected]
646-464-2314 (ET)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--Alexandro Colorado
CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES
http://es.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
Benjamin Horst
[email protected]
646-464-2314 (ET)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--
Alexandro Colorado
CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES
http://es.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
