On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:19:56 +0200
"Charles-H. Schulz" <[email protected]> wrote:

> No. We're not NeoOffice, Lotus or Oracle Open Office: we are
> OpenOffice.org ...
No, you selfproclaimed are TDF/LO in the first place and OpenOffice.org
only if it suits you. If you move your contributions somewhere else it
supports your position there, but not in this project anymore. So when
you are claiming to wanting to move to a more meritocratic structure, it
is unfortunate to see you want to keep influence on a project you do
not want to contribute anymore. As I said before: You cant have a cake
and eat it. If you are still interested in contributing to
OpenOffice.org, I would be very interested in an reliable
precise statement by TDF on how it intends to contribute back to
OpenOffice.org. So far I only heard about how it intends _not_ to
contribute back.

> Think about this fact: People who have been working with you guys for
> 10 years or who generally have contributed their best days, their
> leisure time, their jobs, to build OOo ...
While not being part of the project for so long, you describe me and
many others at Oracle. For many here OpenOffice.org is not just a job
and they are contributing in their leisure time much more than you
might think. These are people that are rightfully feeling part of the
OpenOffice.org community just as you were.

> How could we have come up with such a crazy project for which some,
> if most of you will hate us for the rest of their lives? Again, think
> about it.
I was really interested to find out. Unfortunately by actions seen by
now I get the feeling that naïveté had a lot to do with it. And, by the
way: I have not seen any hate around here, however quite lot of personal
disappointment.

Best Regards,

Bjoern


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to