On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 11:47, Steve Garcia wrote: > Curious, what was the problem with maven-new? Is there not enough support > for it? Or are the main features going to be added to the existing Maven > (therefore obviating the need for maven-new?)
It's been completely rewritten and will be checked in at some point in the near future. There's nothing wrong with it, it's just been refactored many times over now by Michal, myself and a few others. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 7:05 AM > > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: maven-new > > > > > > Howdy, > > > > Just a heads up for anyone but I'm going to tar up maven-new > > and stow it away in preparation for some new code coming in. > > maven-new is now obselete and was an experiment so I'm going > > to pack it in. > > > > -- > > jvz. > > > > Jason van Zyl > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a > > rational and technical order to justify his work and to be > > justified in it. > > > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
