On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 12:10, Stephen McConnell wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > >On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 11:47, Steve Garcia wrote: > > > > > >>Curious, what was the problem with maven-new? Is there not enough support > >>for it? Or are the main features going to be added to the existing Maven > >>(therefore obviating the need for maven-new?) > >> > >> > > > >It's been completely rewritten and will be checked in at some point in > >the near future. There's nothing wrong with it, it's just been > >refactored many times over now by Michal, myself and a few others. > > > > Where has the discussion on this taken place?
Almost entirely on IRC as we often do. But we do have a mailing list that we occasionally use (which is not public) but mostly on IRC. Unfortunately because of we have had comments in our IRC logs showing up in various blogs we had to turn off logging for the sake of personal privacy. We've basically gone through 3 refactorings and are now happy the code and are ready to make plans to integrate it into Maven proper. Currently discussions are underway by the Maven PMC and when we have finished our discussions we would be glad to share our thoughts with the community. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
