Le lundi 17 octobre 2016 20:58:16 Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> Could you at least raise the issues that you see as blocking Gossip against
> it. I presume you have them currently in your context and it would be good
> to capture them now so that if somebody can add those features to Gossip
> (assuming they are aligned with the direction Gossip wants to go) then we
> can reconsider?
ok, let's do it once again: logging configuration with CLI and relative 
timestamp (initial mail from this thread)
see "relative timestamp" in 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201607.mbox/%3CCAK8jvqxYNK4weM2Frp4Brg3J7EybyjBiCsSRdGuNMQhYAG728Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E

> 
> I see this change as more of a feature gap that would have blocked the
> release, not a rejection of the proposal to switch to Gossip
in fact, it's a rejection of any change that does not have at least all 
features of slf4j-simple (without having a precise list of features)

I think I'll go with this monkey-patched slf4j simple provider: that's the 
safest and is maintainable. NOthing prevents us to switch later if useful.

Regards,

Hervé

> 
> On Monday 17 October 2016, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote:
> > adding some rendering code like supported by Gossip, and eventually adding
> > the
> > rendering feature to slf4j-simple seemed sufficiently easy to give it a
> > try:
> > done and was as easy as expected
> > 
> > Now, adding every slf4j-simple feature to Gossip require more work (it's
> > not
> > simply about rendering: need to really dig into code), and is not
> > guaranteed
> > to give smooth experience for everybody: the two missing features that
> > were
> > reported clearly are perhaps the first two of a long list. Jason told that
> > these updates should be feasible, but seemed nobody really tried.
> > 
> > 
> > This option of keeping usual slf4j-simple with a little patch seems
> > currently
> > not foolish
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Hervé
> > 
> > Le lundi 17 octobre 2016 06:49:21 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> > > So your approach was to fork some code, instead of trying to fix Gossip?
> > 
> > I
> > 
> > > haven’t been paying much attention just trying to understand why you
> > 
> > would
> > 
> > > fork instead of working with Jason Dillon to get that added? Did he not
> > > respond or you couldn’t make a PR?
> > > 
> > > Jason
> > > 
> > > > On Oct 17, 2016, at 1:11 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr
> > 
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > Hi Mirko,
> > > > 
> > > > short answer: yes
> > > > 
> > > > more precise answer:
> > > > Gossip slf4j provider does not have color feature but has extensible
> > > > Renderer interface which permits to inject Maven colorized renderer
> > > > [1]
> > > > with one configuration line [2]
> > > > 
> > > > In maven-slf4j-simple, I copied the same Maven colorized renderer code
> > 
> > [3]
> > 
> > > > and injected it in slf4j simple through a Groovy script to patch slf4j
> > > > simple source code [4]: not as straightforward than one fonciguration
> > > > line, but same effect with clean separation of Maven-specific
> > > > extension
> > > > code to support colorized output with Maven styles
> > > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > 
> > > > Hervé
> > > > 
> > > > [1]
> > > > https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/master/maven-> > 
> > embedder/src/main/java/
> > 
> > > > org/apache/maven/cli/logging/impl/gossip/ColorRenderer.java
> > > > 
> > > > [2]
> > > > https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/master/maven-> > 
> > embedder/src/main/resou
> > 
> > > > rces/META-INF/com.planet57.gossip/config.properties#L29
> > > > 
> > > > [3]
> > > > https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/MNG-6093/maven-> > 
> > slf4j-provider/src/ma
> > 
> > > > in/java/org/slf4j/impl/MavenSimpleLogger.java
> > > > 
> > > > [4]
> > > > https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/MNG-6093/maven-> > 
> > slf4j-provider/src/ma
> > 
> > > > in/script/patch-slf4j-simple.groovy>
> > > > 
> > > > Le lundi 17 octobre 2016 07:00:50 Mirko Friedenhagen a écrit :
> > > >> Hello Hervé,
> > > >> 
> > > >> I would like a simple approach here. If I understand it correctly,
> > 
> > gossip
> > 
> > > >> was chosen because of its color capability. If we could have this
> > 
> > without
> > 
> > > >> switching the log provider it would be a good thing IMO. Gossip seems
> > 
> > to
> > 
> > > >> be
> > > >> unconfigurable by means of system properties, which is a pity.
> > > >> 
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> Mirko
> > > >> 
> > > >>> Jason Dillon started the Maven output color work by providing us a
> > > >>> Gossip
> > > >>> slf4j provider renderer adapted to Maven context: thanks Jason
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> Then current master uses Gossip slf4j provider by default with this
> > > >>> customization.
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> Given there were feedback from people finding the change disturbing
> > 
> > vs
> > 
> > > >>> usual
> > > >>> slf4j simple provider (some are just about changing habits, some are
> > > >>> about
> > > >>> missing features like logging configuration with CLI and relative
> > > >>> timestamp),
> > > >>> I tried another approach: patch slf4j simple provider to add
> > > >>> Maven-specific
> > > >>> rendering features.
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> The result is available on MNG-6093 branch with maven-slf4j-provider
> > > >>> module
> > > >>> addition [1]
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> I didn't really try to add features or extensions to slf4j Gossip.
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> What is the best option for Maven: try to improve slf4j Gossip or
> > > >>> use
> > > >>> this
> > > >>> slf4j simple patched version?
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> Regards,
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> Hervé
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/maven/tree/MNG-6093/maven-> > 
> > slf4j-provider
> > 
> > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > ---------
> > 
> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > 
> > <javascript:;>
> > 
> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > 
> > <javascript:;>
> > 
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > 
> > <javascript:;>
> > 
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > 
> > <javascript:;>
> > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Jason
> > > 
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > > Jason van Zyl
> > > Founder, Takari and Apache Maven
> > > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> > > http://twitter.com/takari_io
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > 
> > <javascript:;>
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to