Why the column with build POM in table does not have all items green +? Why there are two consumer POM's? Some is old proposal and second is yours? Some consumer POMs may become BOM and there I would miss dependencyManagement.
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote a Proposal in the Wiki about Build vs Consumer POM [1] and coded a > simplified model for the Consumer POM [2] > As written in the proposal, this would permit us to create new POM versions > that change everything but not the Consumer POM part without breaking any > compatibility with existing Central repository users: build element is the > main element that could be changed, adding new build features/configuration > without affecting consumers. > > In addition to reviewing choices proposed for majority of POM elements, > there > are 4 elements that require more discussion: > - contributors > - mailingLists > - repositories > - profiles/activation > > Any thoughts? > > On the code, IMHO, the only missing part is a test of flatten-maven-plugin > to > check that everything works as expected in any situation. > And I suppose a discussion on what we do for the xsd > > Then we should be able to use this strategy for our own artifacts, before > updating POM model version in any newer Maven version starting with 3.6 > (yay!) > > Regards, > > Hervé > > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ > Build+vs+Consumer+POM > > [2] http://maven.apache.org/studies/consumer-pom/maven-consumer.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
