Am 2018-03-13 um 18:23 schrieb Robert Scholte:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:13:59 +0100, Hervé BOUTEMY
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Charles,
Thanks for the feedback
Le lundi 12 mars 2018, 01:49:26 CET Charles Honton a écrit :
Hervé,
Great work!
Thank you: it took a lot of time and discussion :)
Some possible additions for the wiki page:
Naming Conventions
consumer pom must continue to be named pom.xml
build pom shall be called build.xml
alternate build inputs could be build.json or build.yaml
ok, makes sense, I reworked it and added to the proposal
Well, I think renaming would cause IDE issues (it's claimed for Ant
projects), and this file still represents the Project Object Model,
hence pom still makes sense.
I expect more issues than benefits, and everywhere is documented: a
Maven project requires a pom.xml
I fully agree, build.xml is already taken. Let's stick to pom.xml or at
least to pom-consumer.xml.
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
