Hi Charles, Thanks for the feedback
Le lundi 12 mars 2018, 01:49:26 CET Charles Honton a écrit : > Hervé, > > Great work! Thank you: it took a lot of time and discussion :) > Some possible additions for the wiki page: > > Naming Conventions > consumer pom must continue to be named pom.xml > build pom shall be called build.xml > alternate build inputs could be build.json or build.yaml ok, makes sense, I reworked it and added to the proposal > > EcoSystem Impacts > projects distributing source code through maven central should include the > build pom. This requires updating maven source plugin. why? do people building with Ant publish their build.xml? > flattened consumer > pom will impact version resolution; no, the intent is that it does absolutely not change anything at that level: that's the whole idea, for compatibility > what was a deep dependency will be > brought to second level how will IDEs be affected? ?? Regards, Hervé > > > On Mar 11, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I wrote a Proposal in the Wiki about Build vs Consumer POM [1] and coded a > > simplified model for the Consumer POM [2] > > As written in the proposal, this would permit us to create new POM > > versions > > that change everything but not the Consumer POM part without breaking any > > compatibility with existing Central repository users: build element is the > > main element that could be changed, adding new build > > features/configuration > > without affecting consumers. > > > > In addition to reviewing choices proposed for majority of POM elements, > > there are 4 elements that require more discussion: > > - contributors > > - mailingLists > > - repositories > > - profiles/activation > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > On the code, IMHO, the only missing part is a test of flatten-maven-plugin > > to check that everything works as expected in any situation. > > And I suppose a discussion on what we do for the xsd > > > > Then we should be able to use this strategy for our own artifacts, before > > updating POM model version in any newer Maven version starting with 3.6 > > (yay!) > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Build+vs+Consumer+POM > > > > [2] http://maven.apache.org/studies/consumer-pom/maven-consumer.html > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
