Hi, 2007/8/20, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have > been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed > them, or presumed them erroneous. > > There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been > caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus > container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying > off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done, > another breaks :) > > With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm > confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current > failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set > up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a
+1 > couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded. Count me in > I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be > good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the > messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from it. > > So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and > nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start > to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment. > > This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of > committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's). > > [ ] +1 > [ ] 0 > [ ] -1 > Definetely +1 CI tool *should* be a part of committer's work. Cheers, Vincent > - Brett > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
