As long as we're free to evaluate other tools. Since we've never actually done any comparison I don't want this to be cast in stone or be the only tool we use. In other words I don't want this mandated. I'm happy that it is setup, provided I can use Hudons or something else. Continuum has not been reliable in the past and I don't want any sort of lock in.

There's nothing wrong with it and I'm +1 running it, provided it doesn't preclude the use of other tools.

On 20 Aug 07, at 10:38 PM 20 Aug 07, Brett Porter wrote:

Hi,

Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed them, or presumed them erroneous.

There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done, another breaks :)

With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded.

I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from it.

So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment.

This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).

[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1

- Brett


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to