+1, definitely.
-john
On Aug 20, 2007, at 10:38 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people
have been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably
missed them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't
been caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been
trying off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets
done, another breaks :)
With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down,
I'm confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The
current failures all occur on my own development machine. It is
already set up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and
we have a couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy
and upgraded.
I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd
be good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from it.
So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also
start to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot
deployment.
This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
John Casey
Committer and PMC Member, Apache Maven
mail: jdcasey at commonjava dot org
blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/john
