+1 of course
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus container
changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying off and on
to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done, another breaks :)
With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm
confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current
failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set up,
I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a couple of
volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded.
I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be
good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from it.
So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start to
investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment.
This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of committers
that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
