+1
and it'd be great if it deploys snapshots too :D
On 8/21/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
> been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
> them, or presumed them erroneous.
>
> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
> caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
> container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying
> off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done,
> another breaks :)
>
> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm
> confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current
> failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set
> up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a
> couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded.
>
> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be
> good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
> messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from it.
>
> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start
> to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment.
>
> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
> committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
