There is more beyond that. Remember that we also upgraded to wagon-1.0 which had some _serious_ fixes, etc. + upgrade to the new apache parent and other stuff which have been no maven-core part directly, but got fixed subsequently.
LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 8/19/11, Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org> wrote: > From: Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release maven-3.0.4 now with the old aether > To: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org> > Date: Friday, August 19, 2011, 11:45 AM > I think we should wait for the vote > to finish as it appears the vote will pass and then a > release can be made that users actually want. That fixes are > are most requested fall into the category of requiring the > newer versions of Aether and Sisu. > > I'm certain users would be more interested in having a > version with Aether 1.12 which has been released. So if we > don't want to cut a release with that in it then waiting > another month, I believe, is better than rushing out some > release now with 6 fixes which are minor and making all > users drop in libraries themselves to fix the issues that > are hurting them most. If we want to wait for official > Eclipse releases then we should just wait. > > Users who are on the dev list feel free to chime in. > > ------------------------------------ > Summary of the issues > ------------------------------------ > > [MNG-5064][1] mvn -nsu (--no-snapshot-updates) should not > download snapshots (and break local builds) > [MNG-5131][2] Wrong encoding for encrypted passwords > [MNG-5113][3] NullPointerException on javadoc site > generation > [MNG-5137][4] Reactor resolution does not work for forked > multi module builds > [MNG-5096][5] <exclusion> on <dependency> with > <type>test-jar</type> doesn't work in maven 3 > [MNG-5135][6] Regression: in some cases aggregator mojo is > unable to resolve dependencies with custom packaging > > Fixes not pushed back to the ASF as these are dependent on > fixes in Eclipse Aether and Eclipse Sisu: > > [MNG-5042][7] Regression: CloningClassLoader causes > StackOverflowError in groovy > [MNG-5056][8] Test dependencies get packaged into WAR > file. > [MNG-5084][9] Resolver for plugins failing > [MNG-5087][10] Maven 3 dependency resolution fails until > maven-metadata-local.xml files (created by > maven-invoker-plugin) are deleted > [MNG-5125] [11]Regression: mvn 3.0.3 is extreemly slow with > a large number of dependencies > [MNG-5138][12] Dependency conflicts are extremely opaque > > On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:32 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > I think the outcome of the other vote doesn't change > much. > > The following scenarios are possible: > > > > a.) The vote fails and maven stays at aether 1.11. In > this case we still should ship a 3.0.4 to fix a few bugs on > our side. > > > > b.) The vote passes and aether @eclipse must change > package names + GAV then it will certainly take a bit time > on both sides. So users still could upgrade to aether-1.12 > manually if they want. > > > > c.) The vote passes and aether GAV and package names > are allowed to remain com.sonatype.* In this case users > might also manually update if they want. > > > > In any case we should ship maven-3.0.5 once there is a > new aether version shipped by the Eclipse Foundation AND we > did run sufficient tests with this version on our side. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > --- On Fri, 8/19/11, Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org> > wrote: > > > >> From: Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org> > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release maven-3.0.4 now > with the old aether > >> To: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org> > >> Date: Friday, August 19, 2011, 11:09 AM > >> Mark, > >> > >> I think you're jumping the gun a bit. The vote > that Arnaud > >> proposed is not finished yet. Many PMC members > have not > >> voted yet and at the very least to short-circuit > the vote we > >> need to reach a majority amongst the PMC. Once > that happens > >> then I think we can start discussing a 3.0.4 > release. > >> > >> On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:34 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> > >>> Hi folks! > >>> > >>> I know aether @eclipse should be starting in > the next > >> weeks. But it will certainly take a few more weeks > to get > >> all the packages renamed (most probably), etc. > >>> > >>> Should we create a 3.0.4 with the old aether > package > >> names now and start with the upgrade later? > >>> > >>> +1 from me. > >>> > >>> LieGrue, > >>> strub > >>> > >>> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >>> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Jason > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------- > >> Jason van Zyl > >> Founder, Apache Maven > >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > >> > --------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Simplex sigillum veri. (Simplicity is the seal of > truth.) > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > --------------------------------------------------------- > > There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know > what you're talking about. > > -- John von Neumann > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org