Thats' good :) But seriously, there are two related commits (one doing it, and one undoing it). All I wanted it to simply cover those and have a history for that change in JIRA too....
Thanks, ~t~ On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote: > Should MINDEXER-60 really have a fix version as it is won't fix? It > could trick people just browsing the list of tickets associated with > this relaese to think this has been introduced. > > /Anders > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Howdy, > > > > there are a notable changes in trunk of MI: > > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MINDEXER+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%225.0.0%22+AND+status+%3D+Closed+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/commits/trunk?page=1 > > > > > > So, I'd like to spin a release of it. > > > > Any objections to this? Any last minute wish? > > > > > > Thanks, > > ~t~ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
