Color != modern logging API :p...
Le 9 déc. 2012 16:37, "Olivier Lamy" <ol...@apache.org> a écrit :

> It looks others don't want modern stuff.
> So not a problem. During my life I have used ed, vi then vim or emacs
> now an IDE.
> Those last ones make me see "la vie en rose" with some colors.
> BTW I still like vi maybe Keep It So Simple pattern or I'm too old for
> too much modern stuff :-)
>
> Regarding "immature" I think we have previously based our maven core
> on "immature" stuff. If immature means "young libraries build by
> experimented and efficient folks".
>
> But community/consensus/majority decide.
>
> So even if I'm a French guy (those kind of folks who usually grumble a
> lot :-) ), I will stop complaining (at least I can configure my local
> installation with my preferred mode).
>
> Cheers
> --
> Olivier
>
>
> 2012/12/9 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Simple, log4j, logback...nobody cares about jdk? It is far better than
> > simple and enough by default avoiding log4j/logback issue...then the
> > question would rather be why slf4j since JUL is enough and can be the API
> > as in cxf, owb etc...
> > Le 9 déc. 2012 16:18, "Jason van Zyl" <ja...@tesla.io> a écrit :
> >
> >> I agree. I don't believe it's reasonable path to pick an immature
> library
> >> for the core given the existence of Logback.
> >>
> >> Arnaud, I believe you felt the same way?
> >>
> >> I honestly gave SLF4J Simple a good run and pushed it with Ceki to make
> it
> >> do more than originally intended but I don't think it makes sense to
> push
> >> anymore.
> >>
> >> If other committers have an opinion let's please get this sorted out.
> >>
> >> On Dec 9, 2012, at 5:52 AM, Kristian Rosenvold <
> >> kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > 2012/12/9 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>:
> >> >> Perso I'm fine using log4j2.
> >> >> I use the branch I pushed for some weeks now and I'm happy.
> >> >> Log4j2 has quickly added a feature I needed and release it.
> >> >> Furthermore I'm fine working with an Apache community in case of any
> >> >> issue we could have.
> >> >
> >> > I'm not entirely sure I follow where this discussion is actually
> >> > going,  but I'm firmly opposed
> >> > to including a brand new logging framework as default in m3.
> >> >
> >> > Kristian
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> >> Jason van Zyl
> >> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
> >> Founder,  Apache Maven
> >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Our achievements speak for themselves. What we have to keep track
> >> of are our failures, discouragements and doubts. We tend to forget
> >> the past difficulties, the many false starts, and the painful
> >> groping. We see our past achievements as the end result of a
> >> clean forward thrust, and our present difficulties as
> >> signs of decline and decay.
> >>
> >>  -- Eric Hoffer, Reflections on the Human Condition
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to