> On Oct. 22, 2014, 6:24 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote: > > src/master/flags.hpp, line 339 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26859/diff/2/?file=727113#file727113line339> > > > > I thought the default is going to be cram-md5 to make it backwards > > compatible?
Indeed, the logic has entirely changed in the now updated review-request proposal, following MESOS-1966. - Till ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26859/#review57845 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 21, 2014, 1:01 p.m., Till Toenshoff wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/26859/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 21, 2014, 1:01 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin Hindman, and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-1889 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1889 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > see summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/master/flags.hpp 9d06856 > src/master/master.hpp 14f1d0f > src/master/master.cpp 0a5c9a3 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26859/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > NOTE all three CRAM-MD5 authenticator module related RRs need to get applied > before running make check. > > > Thanks, > > Till Toenshoff > >
