Thanks James and Patrick,

   I have just dropped the suffix "rc2" from the release directory name as 
follows to correct the issue found by Patrick. Thanks.
//https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/mnemonic/0.1.2-incubating-rc2/
 //*--->*//* * 
/https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/mnemonic/0.1.2-incubating//

Hi Yanping, please go ahead to drop "rc2" from your report as Patrick advised. 
Thanks.

Thanks.
+Gary,

On 5/31/2016 4:40 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Yanping Wang <ywang...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks James for the input
>>
>> Sure, I added a line calling out the first release.
>>
>> - For your metrics section, for TLP, the board typically is interested in
>> relative growth compared to the last three months rather than absolute
>> numbers. For example, the Reporter tool collects dev subscribers and number
>> up/down in last 3 months, JIRAs created vs closed/resolved in last 3
>> months. Same for committer/PMC growth (which isn't expected yet). Perhaps
>> you could track new contributors if that's easy/feasible.
>>
>> That is great idea, after this report, next report will be 3 months apart.
>> we can use report tool to give up/down in the past 3 months. As of now Gary
>> is the only code contributor for May. We need break large task into small
>> tasks so others can contribute.
>>
>> - For the "Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need
>> to be aware of?" question, I'd give the stock answer of "There are no
>> issues requiring board attention at this time". Your answer is the same,
>> but using the stock answer makes it easier to ignore/skip.
>>
>> Agree, this is better way. Here is the revised report
>>
>> ========================================
>> Mnemonic
>>
>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
>> structured data processing and computing.
>>
>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
>> On 05/24/2016, we released our first official build:
>> Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2]
>>
> I don't think the release itself was "rc2", that might lead to confusion. I
> believe you should reflect the release naming as it's been released
> officially/finally:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/mnemonic/0.1.2-incubating-rc2/src/
> e.g. "apache-mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating" seems like the right way to refer
> to it to me.
>
> hm... I only just now notice the name of the directory.
> "0.1.2-incubating-rc2" I think you want to move your release files under a
> directory that doesn't include "rc2".
>
>
>> Various metrics for May are as follows: (5/3-5/30/2016)
>>   +--------------------------------------------+
>>   |   Metric                         | counts  |
>>   +--------------------------------------------+
>>   | Non Merge Commits     |  20       |
>>   | Contributors                    |   3        |
>>   | Jira New Issues                 |  17     |
>>   | Resolved Issues                |  17     |
>>   | Pull Requests merged      |   0     |
>>   | Pull Requests proposed   |   0     |
>>   +--------------------------------------------+
>>
>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>>
>> 1. Apache releases: Community voted and released Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating
>> [rc2]
>>
> again, drop the "rc2".
>
>
>> 2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list discussions,
>> 3. Develop new features: We are working in Native computing layer design.
>>
>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware
>> of?
>>
>> There are no issues requiring board attention at this time
>>
>> How has the community developed since the last report?
>>
>> Yanping and Gary presented Mnemonic project at ApacheCon Big Data
>> Conference. Yanping presented at In-Memory Computing Summit. Both talks
>> were well received. Several developers approached us to ask additional
>> details on how Mnemonic worked for Spark. They are interested to see if we
>> are able to successfully integrate Mnemonic into other projects.
>> While we are focusing on develop new features, we will try to contact other
>> projects' communities to explore integration opportunities. As the official
>> release is done this month, for the next 3 months we will increase
>> activities for integration.
>>
>> How has the project developed since the last report?
>>
>> We have been focusing the first Apache release over the past weeks.
>> We also explored ideas on design native computing layer which will further
>> enhance durable Java object model on large non-volatile memory. The
>> challenge is the structure design and breaking down large tasks down to
>> small tasks to attract developers.
>>
>> Date of last release:
>> 05/24/2016, we released our first official build: Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating
>> [rc2]
>>
>>
> ditto.
>
>
>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>> No election, the project is still in early stage of developing.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 8:54 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Content looks good - you're doing a great job so far. Couple of minor
>> nits:
>>> - For date of last release, this is your first release, right? That's a
>> big
>>> deal, so I'd call that out.
>>> - For your metrics section, for TLP, the board typically is interested in
>>> relative growth compared to the last three months rather than absolute
>>> numbers. For example, the Reporter tool collects dev subscribers and
>> number
>>> up/down in last 3 months, JIRAs created vs closed/resolved in last 3
>>> months. Same for committer/PMC growth (which isn't expected yet). Perhaps
>>> you could track new contributors if that's easy/feasible.
>>> - For the "Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board
>> wish/need
>>> to be aware of?" question, I'd give the stock answer of "There are no
>>> issues requiring board attention at this time". Your answer is the same,
>>> but using the stock answer makes it easier to ignore/skip.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> James
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Yanping Wang <ywang...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> Hi, All
>>>>
>>>> Notice the deadline for June report is June 1st.
>>>> I have the following draft, please let me know if you have any
>> additions.
>>>> ==================================
>>>>
>>>> Mnemonic
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
>>>> structured data processing and computing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Various metrics for May are as follows: (5/3-5/30/2016)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   +--------------------------------------------+
>>>>
>>>>   |   Metric                         | counts  |
>>>>
>>>>   +--------------------------------------------+
>>>>
>>>>   | Non Merge Commits     |  20       |
>>>>
>>>>   | Contributors                    |   3        |
>>>>
>>>>   | Jira New Issues                 |  17     |
>>>>
>>>>   | Resolved Issues                |  17     |
>>>>
>>>>   | Pull Requests merged      |   0     |
>>>>
>>>>   | Pull Requests proposed   |   0     |
>>>>
>>>>   +--------------------------------------------+
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   1. Apache releases: Community voted and released
>>>> Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2]
>>>>
>>>>   2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list
>> discussions,
>>>>   3. Develop new features: We are working in Native computing layer
>>> design.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>>>>
>>>> aware of?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How has the community developed since the last report?
>>>>
>>>> Yanping and Gary presented Mnemonic project at ApacheCon Big Data
>>>> Conference. Yanping presented at In-Memory Computing Summit. Both talks
>>>> were well received. Several developers approached us to ask additional
>>>> details on how Mnemonic worked for Spark. They are interested to see if
>>> we
>>>> are able to successfully integrate Mnemonic into other projects.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We think while we are focusing on develop new features, we will also
>> try
>>> to
>>>> contact other projects' communities to explore integration
>> opportunities.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How has the project developed since the last report?
>>>> We have been focusing the first Apache release over the past weeks.
>>>> We also are exploring ideas on design native computing layer which will
>>>> further enhance durable Java object model on large non-volatile memory.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Date of last release: 05/24/2016?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   released Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   No election, the project is still in early stage of developing.
>>>>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to