I joined it now. But I can't unmute myself. I see Pedro (I believe it's
him).
My question is: what do we think about Graphcore?
https://www.graphcore.ai/technology

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 7:03 PM Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> If you wish to join the monthly architecture meeting today, please
> join the hangout below:
>
> https://hangouts.google.com/call/ZXXqJ0ZL5m_dcHOVIeTcAEEE
>
> Regards. Pedro.
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 1:18 AM Pedro Larroy
> <pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I think you make good points. We can address your concerns by sending
> > notes to the mailing list and use the wiki / RFCs appropriately so the
> > community can follow and participate asynchronously so asynchronous
> > participation is still possible.
> >
> > I would say let's try and see if they bring value, we can alway stop
> > if they don't or do it more often if the time is not enough, I think
> > once a month is a conservative choice that doesn't take too much time
> > from our already busy lives.
> >
> > Other open source projects like IPFS do these kind of sessions and
> > seems to work for them.
> >
> > It's also an opportunity to share what we are working on and collaborate
> more.
> >
> > Pedro.
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 7:04 PM Tianqi Chen <tqc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I feel that online meeting may not address most of the issues get
> raised in
> > > a short amount of time(1h) and still suffers the problem of not being
> > > publically archivable.
> > >
> > > Maybe we can not try more asynchronous way? (RFC discussion in issues.
> > > and/or discuss @dev). Just my two cents and I am not blocking the
> proposal
> > >
> > > Tianqi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 5:34 AM Pedro Larroy <
> pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi MXNetters
> > > >
> > > > To address the project growth and increased contributions I'm
> > > > proposing a monthly meeting / hangout to have community discussions
> > > > about MXNet architecture and mid / longer term technical directions
> > > > that require coordination beyond single PRs.
> > > >
> > > > TOPICS:
> > > >
> > > > The goal of this series is to address topics including but not
> limited to:
> > > >  - How to best integrate features that have a big impact on the
> project
> > > >  - Discussion about long term technical direction
> > > >  - Addressing of technical debt / refactoring needed.
> > > >  - Other architectures / framework support. Ex. ARM, Cuda etc.
> > > >  - Build system improvements and tooling such as code coverage,
> static
> > > > analysis etc.
> > > >  - Performance discussions.
> > > >  - Live discussion to address exceptional PRs with complex changes
> > > > that are better discussed live than in written form.
> > > >
> > > > FREQUENCY:
> > > >
> > > > I propose to make this meeting on the second Monday of the month at
> > > > 11am PST /  20pm CET
> > > >
> > > > So the tentative date for the first one would be on January 14th.
> > > >
> > > > If you think this arbitrary date is not good, please say so. In this
> > > > case we can proceed to make a doodle to find a slot that works for
> the
> > > > interested parties.
> > > >
> > > > I have opened a group calendar for our meetings, hangouts and other
> > > > events related to MXNet.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=6co88bqo3n4bjsbt1qrqmsvj4o%40group.calendar.google.com
> > > >
> > > > Pedro.
> > > >
>

Reply via email to