I joined it now. But I can't unmute myself. I see Pedro (I believe it's him). My question is: what do we think about Graphcore? https://www.graphcore.ai/technology
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 7:03 PM Pedro Larroy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > If you wish to join the monthly architecture meeting today, please > join the hangout below: > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/ZXXqJ0ZL5m_dcHOVIeTcAEEE > > Regards. Pedro. > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 1:18 AM Pedro Larroy > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > I think you make good points. We can address your concerns by sending > > notes to the mailing list and use the wiki / RFCs appropriately so the > > community can follow and participate asynchronously so asynchronous > > participation is still possible. > > > > I would say let's try and see if they bring value, we can alway stop > > if they don't or do it more often if the time is not enough, I think > > once a month is a conservative choice that doesn't take too much time > > from our already busy lives. > > > > Other open source projects like IPFS do these kind of sessions and > > seems to work for them. > > > > It's also an opportunity to share what we are working on and collaborate > more. > > > > Pedro. > > > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 7:04 PM Tianqi Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I feel that online meeting may not address most of the issues get > raised in > > > a short amount of time(1h) and still suffers the problem of not being > > > publically archivable. > > > > > > Maybe we can not try more asynchronous way? (RFC discussion in issues. > > > and/or discuss @dev). Just my two cents and I am not blocking the > proposal > > > > > > Tianqi > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 5:34 AM Pedro Larroy < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi MXNetters > > > > > > > > To address the project growth and increased contributions I'm > > > > proposing a monthly meeting / hangout to have community discussions > > > > about MXNet architecture and mid / longer term technical directions > > > > that require coordination beyond single PRs. > > > > > > > > TOPICS: > > > > > > > > The goal of this series is to address topics including but not > limited to: > > > > - How to best integrate features that have a big impact on the > project > > > > - Discussion about long term technical direction > > > > - Addressing of technical debt / refactoring needed. > > > > - Other architectures / framework support. Ex. ARM, Cuda etc. > > > > - Build system improvements and tooling such as code coverage, > static > > > > analysis etc. > > > > - Performance discussions. > > > > - Live discussion to address exceptional PRs with complex changes > > > > that are better discussed live than in written form. > > > > > > > > FREQUENCY: > > > > > > > > I propose to make this meeting on the second Monday of the month at > > > > 11am PST / 20pm CET > > > > > > > > So the tentative date for the first one would be on January 14th. > > > > > > > > If you think this arbitrary date is not good, please say so. In this > > > > case we can proceed to make a doodle to find a slot that works for > the > > > > interested parties. > > > > > > > > I have opened a group calendar for our meetings, hangouts and other > > > > events related to MXNet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=6co88bqo3n4bjsbt1qrqmsvj4o%40group.calendar.google.com > > > > > > > > Pedro. > > > > >
