I could live with m9 in the filename if we must? Hopefully Craig can help us resolve the question about whether we must. (BTW, thanks Craig for helping to guide us through this process)
sean ps. Why m9? Is that to match the 9 in 1.0.9? On 4/14/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hej, look at http://geronimo.apache.org/download.html > That's a perfect solution to our current problem! > Let's do it the same way and call our current release "MyFaces 1.0 > Milestone 9". > "Milestone" sounds better than "beta", right? ;-) > > Regarding filename: > IMHO, as long as we make clear that this is no certified or final release > on the official download page, it's ok to name the files myfaces-1.0.9.zip > and myfaces-1.0.9.tgz anyway. This would propably be the best way to not > confuse people that already dealt with the release candidates > myfaces-1.0.9rc1.tgz and so on. > But for my part I can also live with myfaces-1.0-m9.tgz > > -Manfred > > > On 4/14/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Label it as a non-final release, and make sure the world understands > this. > > > > Right now the distribuiton file is myfaces-1.0.9.zip and > > myfaces-1.0.9.tgz. If we clearly state in the announcement, the > > MyFaces site and in the jar file that this is non-final release would > > that suffice? > > > > If we need to indicate this in the actual filename then what would you > > suggest? myfaces-1.0.9beta.zip? > > myfaces-1.0.9ea.zip? (ea for early access) > > > > > Craig > > > > sean > > > >
