<rant> It seems to me that all this will be very confusing for users whether we call this "Beta" or "non-final". We might as well call it "horse poop", because nobody will want to use it in a real app.
It IS MyFaces 1.0.9. It should only be called "Beta" if it is not ready for prime time. I know that before the JBoss Application Server passed the TCK we didn't go around calling our product "Beta". </rant> Can we get a clarification from Sun as to what the requirements are? I'm sure they will be reasonable about it. Stan Silvert JBoss, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://stansilvert > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; MyFaces Development > Subject: Re: Who belongs to the 'apsite' group on Minotaur? > > > Label it as a non-final release, and make sure the world understands > this. > > Right now the distribuiton file is myfaces-1.0.9.zip and > myfaces-1.0.9.tgz. If we clearly state in the announcement, the > MyFaces site and in the jar file that this is non-final release would > that suffice? > > If we need to indicate this in the actual filename then what would you > suggest? myfaces-1.0.9beta.zip? > myfaces-1.0.9ea.zip? (ea for early access) > > > Craig > > sean
