On 4/14/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I could live with m9 in the filename if we must? Hopefully Craig can > help us resolve the question about whether we must. (BTW, thanks > Craig for helping to guide us through this process)
I think it would be better if the filename reflected the state, but it's not really required. Craig > > sean > > ps. Why m9? Is that to match the 9 in 1.0.9? > > > On 4/14/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hej, look at http://geronimo.apache.org/download.html > > That's a perfect solution to our current problem! > > Let's do it the same way and call our current release "MyFaces 1.0 > > Milestone 9". > > "Milestone" sounds better than "beta", right? ;-) > > > > Regarding filename: > > IMHO, as long as we make clear that this is no certified or final release > > on the official download page, it's ok to name the files myfaces-1.0.9.zip > > and myfaces-1.0.9.tgz anyway. This would propably be the best way to not > > confuse people that already dealt with the release candidates > > myfaces-1.0.9rc1.tgz and so on. > > But for my part I can also live with myfaces-1.0-m9.tgz > > > > -Manfred > > > > > > On 4/14/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Label it as a non-final release, and make sure the world understands > > this. > > > > > > Right now the distribuiton file is myfaces-1.0.9.zip and > > > myfaces-1.0.9.tgz. If we clearly state in the announcement, the > > > MyFaces site and in the jar file that this is non-final release would > > > that suffice? > > > > > > If we need to indicate this in the actual filename then what would you > > > suggest? myfaces-1.0.9beta.zip? > > > myfaces-1.0.9ea.zip? (ea for early access) > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > >
