I have implemented most of the new core API's and fixed most of the deprecated ones to be backwards compatible with 1.1 (if you look at the 1.2 javadocs you'll see what I mean). If you look at the section in the spec preface entitled "What's Changed Since the Last Release" you can get a feel for what I did. I've pretty much done everything in that list.
Most of it is covered under this issue, which just says to implement several sections of the spec: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1274 I believe all of 1274 is complete except ApplicationImpl.getResourceBundle(). I needed code that reads the new faces-context.xml for that one. However, all the ELResolver stuff is done including the ResourceBundleELResolver. I've also done some of the issues listed under General Changes. For each item in that list, I created a Jira task. You can look at Jira and see which ones I did. I was just getting started on the javax.faces.webapp package when I was taken off of the project. I probably won't commit any changes from that. I didn't touch the components or renderer at all. With all the backward-compatible code I wrote, it appears that all the components still work even though they are written the "1.1 way". So, hopefully, what you guys will have to start with is a JSF 1.2 impl that is about half-way done and still works. Stan Silvert JBoss, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://stansilvert > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Spiegl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:58 PM > To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces > Committers/Contributors meeting] > > +1 for solving tomahawk 416, being incompatible to RI is a serious issue > > Stan which 1.2 issues did you fix. Did you change any link renderers? > If not, i am > +1 for open a 1.2 branch > > On 5/17/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sean Schofield schrieb: > > > I'm -1 on the 1.2 branch. There are major issues to be fixed in the > > > core right now. (See TOMAHAWK-416 and related dev discussions.) I > > > know that Stan is anxious but given the lack of interest in the core > > > trunk, its hard to imagine we have enough support to sustain this > > > branch. Do we have firm committments from anyone else besides Stan? > > > > > +1 for a fork... the reason we need to get going asap and a fork helps. > > If we wait for another bunch of issues to be fixed, this will never end. > > Sorry to say that so harsh, but the time on 1.2 is really pressing, > > given that there wont be an option in jee to override the default JSF > > implementation via other libs in WEB-INF/lib like it was possible in > JEE4 > > > > > > > -- > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
