On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only interested in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem interested in Tobago is a danger signal.
Craig
Not really.
But I need a vote from 2 other pmc member.
Can you encourage 2 pmc member to vote for the release.
FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only interested in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem interested in Tobago is a danger signal.
Regards
Bernd
Craig
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> too late ?
>
> +1
> ...
>
> sorry for the delay, Bernd
>
> On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Thanks Wendy,
>> >
>> > but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4 +1(non-binding).
>> >
>> > Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
>> >
>> > [1] http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
>> > [2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
>>
>> The relevant sections are:
>> http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>> ... and 'Binding Votes' at the top of the page, which doesn't have
>> an anchor.
>>
>> I see you found the 'majority approval' section. :) Release votes are
>> similar to that, except that releases can't be vetoed. (I've never
>> seen a release that had a -1, though... usually the release manager
>> will stop the vote and fix the problem.)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Wendy
>>
>
>
