hello, @jsr 303: i had a quick look at it and i agree with matthias (in view of the annotation part of the jsr - the rest of the jsr isn't defined at the moment).
concerning the more complex annotations of jsr 303: we will have to introduce a mechanism which is similar to the cross-validation mechanism. the core of sev-en doesn't care about concrete annotation details. if there is no unexpected detail within the jsr, it will be enough to impl. a sev-en jsr 303 annotation module. concerning external annotations: there is the possibility to map sev-en validation strategies to external (= none sev-en) annotations. also such a mapping is the responsibility of the concrete sev-en annotation module -> the core isn't affected (see the current jpa validation support). in my opinion we should discuss such details within a separated thread. @commons-[new name]: i had some main doubts. matthias and i talked about them and after our talk i've got a better impression. however, before i'll agree i would like to see clarifications and some improvements of the current situation of the commons module. regards, gerhard 2008/4/22 Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Sure, that's okay for the location of seven. > > most committers voted for that ;-) > > > > > My other concern is how sev-en will play with jsr 303. > > IMO it should be possible to get that working (as an impl?) as well > > -M > > > > > Cagatay > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Cagatay, > > > > > > What about the commons project. MyFaces Commons Utils and MyFaces > Commons > > Configurators don't render anyting. > > > > > > Cagatay Civici wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > My mind hasn't changed since the last discussion so it's still -1 > for a > > stand-alone project because in my opinion every goodie, extension > etc...) > > that doesn't render anything should join orchestra. > > > > > > > > We might end up with a subproject hell that's hard to maintain if we > > create a subproject for each jsf extension. > > > > > > > > Orchestra core15 module is a nice place for sev-en. > > > > > > > > Cagatay > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok Gerhard my apologies then if all of this is discussed out > > > > then a clear +1 > > > > from my side. > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > Gerhard Petracek schrieb: > > > > > > > > hello werner, > > > > > > > > thank you for your additional hint. > > > > however, we already discussed this topic and there are > several > > > > arguments against the integration. > > > > > > > > this vote is just about sev-en as a stand-alone sub-project > of > > > > myfaces. > > > > > > > > (aspect-el is a different topic. so let's have a separated > vote.) > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2008/4/20, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>: > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 but one addition > > > > > > > > since we already have an extension api project > > > > wouldnt it be better to be integrated into orchestra > > > > I think since orchestra is not a scope project although > > > > its main area is scoping that sev-en should belong in > there. > > > > Think about that, I think orchestra might be the perfect > place > > > > for things like sev-en and/or aspect-el > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > Gerhard Petracek schrieb: > > > > > > > > hello, > > > > > > > > as requested i published the source code of the sev-en > > > > preview > > > > some days ago (details at: [1]). > > > > > > > > we discussed whether or not we should start a new > myfaces > > > > sub-project. > > > > > > > > so let's vote! > > > > (there will be a separated discussion + vote > concerning > > > > the name.) > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > [ ] +1 for: sev-en should become a myfaces sub-project > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > [ ] -1 for: sev-en shouldn't become a myfaces > sub-project > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/-proposal--jsf-validation-with-annotations-to16483341.html#a16747103 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
