Hi Could you be more specific? what should we do? just do not distribute WAR files? add a note?
regards, Leonardo Uribe 2011/9/19 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>: > +1 > regards, > gerhard > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > 2011/9/19 Jakob Korherr <[email protected]> >> >> +1 >> >> Regards, >> Jakob >> >> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >> > Hi folks! >> > >> > >> > I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit Trinidad but also a lot other >> > projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this very topic. >> > >> > Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in apache-parent should >> > make sure that each file properly contains LICENSE and NOTICE files. >> > Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR files which we ship for >> > samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are 2 problematic issues >> > >> > 1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See the mail below how >> > to solve this. >> > >> > 2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal sense) 3-rd party JAR files >> > inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory! >> > This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled the deployment of >> > our samples via maven because of that! >> > You can get the sources in the source-distribution.zip, you can build it >> > yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party JARs which are not developed >> > inside the ASF this way. >> > >> > Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs javassist which is MPL >> > licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a lot other CategoryA and >> > CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs certain attribution when >> > you _distribute_ the project! >> > >> > WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too? >> > >> > LieGrue, >> > strub >> > >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html >> > >> > >> > ----- Forwarded Message ----- >> >> From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >> >> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]> >> >> Cc: >> >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM >> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1 >> >> >> >> Hi Scott! >> >> >> >> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a -1. >> >> >> >> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!) >> >> >> >> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find. >> >> >> >> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past without those, but I >> >> only >> >> recently became aware of this problem in OpenWebBeans where I had to >> >> re-roll my >> >> release too. >> >> >> >> This can easily get fixed by doing some packaging tricks >> >> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the OWB samples >> >> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml >> >> >> >> The important part is >> >> <webResources> <resource> <directory>.</directory> >> >> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath> <includes> >> >> <include>LICENSE</include> <include>NOTICE</include> >> >> </includes> </resource> </webResources> >> >> >> >> Otherwise the release looks fine so far. >> >> >> >> >> >> txs LieGrue, >> >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >>> From: Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]> >> >>> To: [email protected] >> >>> Cc: >> >>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM >> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1 >> >>> >> >>> Hi Everyone, >> >>> >> >>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.1 release out >> >>> and >> >> now I >> >>> need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. I have >> >>> committed >> >> most >> >>> of the most recent submitted patches and things look to be fairly >> >>> stable. >> >> There >> >>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted to put those into trunk >> >>> so that >> >> they >> >>> can get some more testing. >> >>> >> >>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this release. All of >> >>> the >> >> following >> >>> should be ready for review: >> >>> >> >>> * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [1] >> >>> * The generated source archive [2] >> >>> * The updated svn repository [3] >> >>> >> >>> Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following: >> >>> >> >>> ------------------------------------------------ >> >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits >> >>> [ ] +0 >> >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be >> >>> released, >> >>> and why.............. >> >>> ------------------------------------------------ >> >>> >> >>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Scott O'Bryan >> >>> >> >>> [1] >> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072 >> >>> [2] >> >>> >> >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip >> >>> [3] >> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1 >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Jakob Korherr >> >> blog: http://www.jakobk.com >> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr >> work: http://www.irian.at > >
