oops this should have been gone to the list^^ LieGrue, strub
----- Forwarded Message ----- > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > To: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 9:13 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc > > oops, we must not use LPGL at all, as it's a Category X license and not > compatible with ALv2 [1]. > Is there some alternative for it? > > LieGrue, > strub > > [http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#transition] > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> >> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]>; Mark Struberg > <[email protected]> >> Cc: >> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:07 AM >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc >> >> Hi Mark >> >> Ok, I see. I think we have a problem with >> trinidad-components-showcase. It has jhighlight-1.0.jar and its >> license is LGPL. >> >> The other WARs bundled in other projects (I believe they) are ok . >> >> regards, >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >>> Hi Leo! >>> >>> Imo we should go through all WAR files we create and check which jars > they >> contain. >>> Maybe it's perfectly fine and we only distribute ASF internal or >> CategoryA stuff. >>> >>> In this case not much should be needed. Otherwise we must check the >> licenses of the libs and see which requirements they have. >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> >>>> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: >>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:18 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Could you be more specific? what should we do? just do not > distribute >>>> WAR files? add a note? >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> >>>> Leonardo Uribe >>>> >>>> 2011/9/19 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>: >>>>> +1 >>>>> regards, >>>>> gerhard >>>>> >>>>> http://www.irian.at >>>>> >>>>> Your JSF powerhouse - >>>>> JSF Consulting, Development and >>>>> Courses in English and German >>>>> >>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2011/9/19 Jakob Korherr <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Jakob >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >>>>>> > Hi folks! >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit > Trinidad >> but also a >>>> lot other >>>>>> > projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this > very >> topic. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in >> apache-parent >>>> should >>>>>> > make sure that each file properly contains LICENSE > and >> NOTICE >>>> files. >>>>>> > Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR > >> files which >>>> we ship for >>>>>> > samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are > 2 >> problematic >>>> issues >>>>>> > >>>>>> > 1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See > the >> mail >>>> below how >>>>>> > to solve this. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > 2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal > sense) >> 3-rd >>>> party JAR files >>>>>> > inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory! >>>>>> > This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled > the >>>> deployment of >>>>>> > our samples via maven because of that! >>>>>> > You can get the sources in the > source-distribution.zip, >> you can >>>> build it >>>>>> > yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party > JARs >> which are >>>> not developed >>>>>> > inside the ASF this way. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs > javassist >> which is >>>> MPL >>>>>> > licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a > lot >> other >>>> CategoryA and >>>>>> > CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs > certain >>>> attribution when >>>>>> > you _distribute_ the project! >>>>>> > >>>>>> > WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > LieGrue, >>>>>> > strub >>>>>> > >>>>>> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ----- Forwarded Message ----- >>>>>> >> From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>>>>> >> To: MyFaces Development >> <[email protected]> >>>>>> >> Cc: >>>>>> >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM >>>>>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1 >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Hi Scott! >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a > -1. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!) >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past >> without those, >>>> but I >>>>>> >> only >>>>>> >> recently became aware of this problem in > OpenWebBeans >> where I >>>> had to >>>>>> >> re-roll my >>>>>> >> release too. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> This can easily get fixed by doing some > packaging >> tricks >>>>>> >> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the > OWB >> samples >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> The important part is >>>>>> >> <webResources> <resource> >>>> <directory>.</directory> >>>>>> >> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath> >> <includes> >>>>>> >> <include>LICENSE</include> >>>> <include>NOTICE</include> >>>>>> >> </includes> </resource> >> </webResources> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Otherwise the release looks fine so far. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> txs LieGrue, >>>>>> >> strub >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> >>> From: Scott O'Bryan >> <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> >>> Cc: >>>>>> >>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM >>>>>> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1 >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> I was running the tasks needed to get the >> Trinidad 2.0.1 >>>> release out >>>>>> >>> and >>>>>> >> now I >>>>>> >>> need a vote as to whether everything looks > good >> or not. >>>> I have >>>>>> >>> committed >>>>>> >> most >>>>>> >>> of the most recent submitted patches and > things >> look to >>>> be fairly >>>>>> >>> stable. >>>>>> >> There >>>>>> >>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted > to >> put those >>>> into trunk >>>>>> >>> so that >>>>>> >> they >>>>>> >>> can get some more testing. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote > on >> this >>>> release. All of >>>>>> >>> the >>>>>> >> following >>>>>> >>> should be ready for review: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> * The generated repository and assembly >> artifacts [1] >>>>>> >>> * The generated source archive [2] >>>>>> >>> * The updated svn repository [3] >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Please review the artifacts and vote > according >> to the >>>> following: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> > ------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have > reviewed >> the bits >>>>>> >>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause > these >> bits not >>>> to be >>>>>> >>> released, >>>>>> >>> and why.............. >>>>>> >>> > ------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 >> hours. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>> Scott O'Bryan >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> [1] >>>>>> >>> >>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072 >>>>>> >>> [2] >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip >>>>>> >>> [3] >>>>>> >>> >>>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1 >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Jakob Korherr >>>>>> >>>>>> blog: http://www.jakobk.com >>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr >>>>>> work: http://www.irian.at >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
