Hi Mark

Ok, I see. I think we have a problem with
trinidad-components-showcase. It has jhighlight-1.0.jar and its
license is LGPL.

The other WARs bundled in other projects (I believe they) are ok .

regards,

Leonardo Uribe

2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
> Hi Leo!
>
> Imo we should go through all WAR files we create and check which jars they 
> contain.
> Maybe it's perfectly fine and we only distribute ASF internal or CategoryA 
> stuff.
>
> In this case not much should be needed. Otherwise we must check the licenses 
> of the libs and see which requirements they have.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]>
>> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:18 AM
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Could you be more specific? what should we do? just do not distribute
>> WAR files? add a note?
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>> 2011/9/19 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>:
>>>  +1
>>>  regards,
>>>  gerhard
>>>
>>>  http://www.irian.at
>>>
>>>  Your JSF powerhouse -
>>>  JSF Consulting, Development and
>>>  Courses in English and German
>>>
>>>  Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  2011/9/19 Jakob Korherr <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>  +1
>>>>
>>>>  Regards,
>>>>  Jakob
>>>>
>>>>  2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
>>>>  > Hi folks!
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  > I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit Trinidad but also a
>> lot other
>>>>  > projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this very topic.
>>>>  >
>>>>  > Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in apache-parent
>> should
>>>>  > make sure that each file properly contains LICENSE and NOTICE
>> files.
>>>>  > Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR files which
>> we ship for
>>>>  > samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are 2 problematic
>> issues
>>>>  >
>>>>  > 1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See the mail
>> below how
>>>>  > to solve this.
>>>>  >
>>>>  > 2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal sense) 3-rd
>> party JAR files
>>>>  > inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory!
>>>>  > This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled the
>> deployment of
>>>>  > our samples via maven because of that!
>>>>  > You can get the sources in the source-distribution.zip, you can
>> build it
>>>>  > yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party JARs which are
>> not developed
>>>>  > inside the ASF this way.
>>>>  >
>>>>  > Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs javassist which is
>> MPL
>>>>  > licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a lot other
>> CategoryA and
>>>>  > CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs certain
>> attribution when
>>>>  > you _distribute_ the project!
>>>>  >
>>>>  > WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too?
>>>>  >
>>>>  > LieGrue,
>>>>  > strub
>>>>  >
>>>>  > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  > ----- Forwarded Message -----
>>>>  >> From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>>>>  >> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]>
>>>>  >> Cc:
>>>>  >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM
>>>>  >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> Hi Scott!
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a -1.
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!)
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find.
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past without those,
>> but I
>>>>  >> only
>>>>  >> recently became aware of this problem in OpenWebBeans where I
>> had to
>>>>  >> re-roll my
>>>>  >> release too.
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> This can easily get fixed by doing some packaging tricks
>>>>  >> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the OWB samples
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> The important part is
>>>>  >> <webResources> <resource>
>> <directory>.</directory>
>>>>  >> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath> <includes>
>>>>  >> <include>LICENSE</include>
>> <include>NOTICE</include>
>>>>  >> </includes> </resource> </webResources>
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> Otherwise the release looks fine so far.
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> txs LieGrue,
>>>>  >> strub
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>  >>>  From: Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]>
>>>>  >>>  To: [email protected]
>>>>  >>>  Cc:
>>>>  >>>  Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM
>>>>  >>>  Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>>  Hi Everyone,
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>>  I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.1
>> release out
>>>>  >>> and
>>>>  >> now I
>>>>  >>>  need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.
>> I have
>>>>  >>> committed
>>>>  >> most
>>>>  >>>  of the most recent submitted patches and things look to
>> be fairly
>>>>  >>> stable.
>>>>  >> There
>>>>  >>>  are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted to put those
>> into trunk
>>>>  >>> so that
>>>>  >> they
>>>>  >>>  can get some more testing.
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>>  Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this
>> release.  All of
>>>>  >>> the
>>>>  >> following
>>>>  >>>  should be ready for review:
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>>  * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [1]
>>>>  >>>  * The generated source archive [2]
>>>>  >>>  * The updated svn repository [3]
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>>  Please review the artifacts and vote according to the
>> following:
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>>  ------------------------------------------------
>>>>  >>>  [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>  >>>  [ ] +0
>>>>  >>>  [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not
>> to be
>>>>  >>> released,
>>>>  >>>  and why..............
>>>>  >>>  ------------------------------------------------
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>>  This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>>  Thanks,
>>>>  >>>    Scott O'Bryan
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>>  [1]
>>>>  >>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
>>>>  >>>  [2]
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
>>>>  >>>  [3]
>>>>  >>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>>  Jakob Korherr
>>>>
>>>>  blog: http://www.jakobk.com
>>>>  twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
>>>>  work: http://www.irian.at
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to