there was a discussion [1] about it. regards, gerhard
[1] http://goo.gl/UccA6 http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2011/9/20 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > oops this should have been gone to the list^^ > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Forwarded Message ----- > > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > To: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> > > Cc: > > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 9:13 AM > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc > > > > oops, we must not use LPGL at all, as it's a Category X license and not > > compatible with ALv2 [1]. > > Is there some alternative for it? > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > [http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#transition] > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> > >> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]>; Mark Struberg > > <[email protected]> > >> Cc: > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:07 AM > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc > >> > >> Hi Mark > >> > >> Ok, I see. I think we have a problem with > >> trinidad-components-showcase. It has jhighlight-1.0.jar and its > >> license is LGPL. > >> > >> The other WARs bundled in other projects (I believe they) are ok . > >> > >> regards, > >> > >> Leonardo Uribe > >> > >> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > >>> Hi Leo! > >>> > >>> Imo we should go through all WAR files we create and check which jars > > they > >> contain. > >>> Maybe it's perfectly fine and we only distribute ASF internal or > >> CategoryA stuff. > >>> > >>> In this case not much should be needed. Otherwise we must check the > >> licenses of the libs and see which requirements they have. > >>> > >>> LieGrue, > >>> strub > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>> From: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> > >>>> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]> > >>>> Cc: > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:18 AM > >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc > >>>> > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> Could you be more specific? what should we do? just do not > > distribute > >>>> WAR files? add a note? > >>>> > >>>> regards, > >>>> > >>>> Leonardo Uribe > >>>> > >>>> 2011/9/19 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>: > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> regards, > >>>>> gerhard > >>>>> > >>>>> http://www.irian.at > >>>>> > >>>>> Your JSF powerhouse - > >>>>> JSF Consulting, Development and > >>>>> Courses in English and German > >>>>> > >>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> 2011/9/19 Jakob Korherr <[email protected]> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> Jakob > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > >>>>>> > Hi folks! > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit > > Trinidad > >> but also a > >>>> lot other > >>>>>> > projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this > > very > >> topic. > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in > >> apache-parent > >>>> should > >>>>>> > make sure that each file properly contains LICENSE > > and > >> NOTICE > >>>> files. > >>>>>> > Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR > > > >> files which > >>>> we ship for > >>>>>> > samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are > > 2 > >> problematic > >>>> issues > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > 1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See > > the > >> mail > >>>> below how > >>>>>> > to solve this. > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > 2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal > > sense) > >> 3-rd > >>>> party JAR files > >>>>>> > inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory! > >>>>>> > This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled > > the > >>>> deployment of > >>>>>> > our samples via maven because of that! > >>>>>> > You can get the sources in the > > source-distribution.zip, > >> you can > >>>> build it > >>>>>> > yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party > > JARs > >> which are > >>>> not developed > >>>>>> > inside the ASF this way. > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs > > javassist > >> which is > >>>> MPL > >>>>>> > licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a > > lot > >> other > >>>> CategoryA and > >>>>>> > CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs > > certain > >>>> attribution when > >>>>>> > you _distribute_ the project! > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too? > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > LieGrue, > >>>>>> > strub > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > ----- Forwarded Message ----- > >>>>>> >> From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >>>>>> >> To: MyFaces Development > >> <[email protected]> > >>>>>> >> Cc: > >>>>>> >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM > >>>>>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1 > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> Hi Scott! > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a > > -1. > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!) > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find. > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past > >> without those, > >>>> but I > >>>>>> >> only > >>>>>> >> recently became aware of this problem in > > OpenWebBeans > >> where I > >>>> had to > >>>>>> >> re-roll my > >>>>>> >> release too. > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> This can easily get fixed by doing some > > packaging > >> tricks > >>>>>> >> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the > > OWB > >> samples > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> The important part is > >>>>>> >> <webResources> <resource> > >>>> <directory>.</directory> > >>>>>> >> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath> > >> <includes> > >>>>>> >> <include>LICENSE</include> > >>>> <include>NOTICE</include> > >>>>>> >> </includes> </resource> > >> </webResources> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> Otherwise the release looks fine so far. > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> txs LieGrue, > >>>>>> >> strub > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>>>> >>> From: Scott O'Bryan > >> <[email protected]> > >>>>>> >>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>> >>> Cc: > >>>>>> >>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM > >>>>>> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1 > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> Hi Everyone, > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> I was running the tasks needed to get the > >> Trinidad 2.0.1 > >>>> release out > >>>>>> >>> and > >>>>>> >> now I > >>>>>> >>> need a vote as to whether everything looks > > good > >> or not. > >>>> I have > >>>>>> >>> committed > >>>>>> >> most > >>>>>> >>> of the most recent submitted patches and > > things > >> look to > >>>> be fairly > >>>>>> >>> stable. > >>>>>> >> There > >>>>>> >>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted > > to > >> put those > >>>> into trunk > >>>>>> >>> so that > >>>>>> >> they > >>>>>> >>> can get some more testing. > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote > > on > >> this > >>>> release. All of > >>>>>> >>> the > >>>>>> >> following > >>>>>> >>> should be ready for review: > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> * The generated repository and assembly > >> artifacts [1] > >>>>>> >>> * The generated source archive [2] > >>>>>> >>> * The updated svn repository [3] > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> Please review the artifacts and vote > > according > >> to the > >>>> following: > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> > > ------------------------------------------------ > >>>>>> >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have > > reviewed > >> the bits > >>>>>> >>> [ ] +0 > >>>>>> >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause > > these > >> bits not > >>>> to be > >>>>>> >>> released, > >>>>>> >>> and why.............. > >>>>>> >>> > > ------------------------------------------------ > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 > >> hours. > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> Thanks, > >>>>>> >>> Scott O'Bryan > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> [1] > >>>>>> >>> > >>>> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072 > >>>>>> >>> [2] > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>> > >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip > >>>>>> >>> [3] > >>>>>> >>> > >>>> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1 > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Jakob Korherr > >>>>>> > >>>>>> blog: http://www.jakobk.com > >>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr > >>>>>> work: http://www.irian.at > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > >
