On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 04:32, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> wrote: > The core of my alternative proposal is to move forward and support newer JDKs > properly, where needed via the "Run on JDK8, use JDK11 APIs!" - http:// > wiki.apidesign.org/wiki/AlternativeImplementation > > Are you saying we are using this proposal already for last 18 months? I am not > aware of that! If I am mistaken, then please point me to few PRs that are > implementing the "Run on JDK8, use JDK11 APIs!" technique!
Original decision for NetBeans 13, which you replied on - https://lists.apache.org/thread/rcfv7vgrz6byb2y1pjpv4894xh7p96d2 You also reference that wiki page in your reply, and possibly in the preceding discussion. I read it then (and since). First PR with actual compiled JDK 11 code was I assume the Disco library upgrade? I certainly had to fix the commit validation tests. Matthias has had to fix that test further since for EE10. https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/3974 > > maintenance of the JDK 8 tests is something > > ...none of you wants to do. I understand that. No, none of us thinks that's where the vast majority of the extra workload of this now is! Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
