As far as I remember this was always the case for SEVERE logs with exceptions and pop-up only happened for WARNING (a little odd, but I thought that was intended).
Attila Jan Lahoda <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. nov. 7., Sze, 23:57): > Hi, > > My personal opinion only: > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:14 PM Christian Lenz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Yeah well, well again. I said only in my opinion, so I’m open to discuss > > it. The one with the tripple click, could be a Corner case, but it never > > happened before and I had the Situation, where the execption window came > up > > which is annoying. > > > > I am mildly surprised there was an exception window in the release build - > the popup should be suppressed in release builds? I just tried VC3, and it > seems the exception is thrown, but there's no popup, it "just" adds the > warning sign on right bottom corner? (Ability to select does not seem to be > affected?) > > Frankly, for marking something a blocker, we should not only judge if (and > how much) a thing is annoying and if it is reproducible, but also how > important/common is the usecase/what is the impact. In this case, it is a > double (mouse) click in the editor, keep the mouse button pressed after the > second click and move the mouse cursor beyond the end of the document. So, > my personal opinion is that this is annoying, reproducible and should be > fixed, but I don't see it to be severe enough to stop the release at the > current stage. > > Also - the same thing happens for NB 8.2 for me, so I guess I wonder if > there's some new information on why we could live with this so far, but the > fix can't wait for the next release. > > In any case, the bug was missing a reproducible testcase(!!), so I just > added one. > > Jan > > > > The NPE was in my opinion a blocker, to make it clear what there happens > > and it was still annyoing that an NPE came up, with the exception window, > > after using find usages. So this should not happen at all. > > > > 586 is the one with the NPE and 1012 is wrong, smth with javadoc, I think > > you mean 1440, Right? > > > > My 2 cents. > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Chris > > > > > > Von: Laszlo Kishalmi > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 17:48 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid > > > > Well, well, > > > > As of NETBEANS-586 it was created in April and suddenly after vc3 it > > became a BLOCKER... > > As of NETBEANS-1012 It was "just" CRITICAL two days ago. For me the issue > > describes a not that common use case. (Well of course it is really > > subjective.) > > > > I'm not really happy about that, in the last two week of the release > cycle > > some dormant bugs just gets elevated as BLOCKER-s. > > If we really need to cut a vc4 on this weekend I'm happy to merge the PR > > for NETBEANS-1012. However I do not think we need that. > > > > Laszlo Kishalmi > > Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 10.0 > > > > > > On 11/7/18 7:45 AM, Christian Lenz wrote: > > > And this is the other blocker, which has not yet a PR: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-586 > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > Von: Geertjan Wielenga > > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 16:36 > > > An: dev > > > Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid > > > > > > Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too early to vote on the > sources, > > > since we're still running the survey on the binary. > > > > > > But that thread, indeed, since it's there, and if it's not going to be > > > replaced by a new vote thread, because potentially we'll need to spin > up > > > another voting candidate (which doesn't seem likely to me, right now, > > i.e., > > > I think we have everything we want in vc3), is the one to use. > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:03 PM Neil C Smith <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Geertjan Wielenga > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent > > >> Apache > > >>> NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources > > >> I'm confused! So the current 10-vc3 vote thread isn't a vote thread?! > > >> > > >>> (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at > > most > > >>> the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries > > >> Speaking of which, we could do with having a convenience Javadoc > > >> archive alongside the binaries by actual release day. > > >> > > >> Best wishes, > > >> > > >> Neil > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > [email protected] > > >> > > >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > > > >
