Yeah well, well again. I said only in my opinion, so I’m open to discuss it. The one with the tripple click, could be a Corner case, but it never happened before and I had the Situation, where the execption window came up which is annoying.
The NPE was in my opinion a blocker, to make it clear what there happens and it was still annyoing that an NPE came up, with the exception window, after using find usages. So this should not happen at all. 586 is the one with the NPE and 1012 is wrong, smth with javadoc, I think you mean 1440, Right? My 2 cents. Cheers Chris Von: Laszlo Kishalmi Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 17:48 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid Well, well, As of NETBEANS-586 it was created in April and suddenly after vc3 it became a BLOCKER... As of NETBEANS-1012 It was "just" CRITICAL two days ago. For me the issue describes a not that common use case. (Well of course it is really subjective.) I'm not really happy about that, in the last two week of the release cycle some dormant bugs just gets elevated as BLOCKER-s. If we really need to cut a vc4 on this weekend I'm happy to merge the PR for NETBEANS-1012. However I do not think we need that. Laszlo Kishalmi Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 10.0 On 11/7/18 7:45 AM, Christian Lenz wrote: > And this is the other blocker, which has not yet a PR: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-586 > > > Cheers > > Chris > > > > Von: Geertjan Wielenga > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 16:36 > An: dev > Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid > > Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too early to vote on the sources, > since we're still running the survey on the binary. > > But that thread, indeed, since it's there, and if it's not going to be > replaced by a new vote thread, because potentially we'll need to spin up > another voting candidate (which doesn't seem likely to me, right now, i.e., > I think we have everything we want in vc3), is the one to use. > > Gj > > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:03 PM Neil C Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Geertjan Wielenga >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent >> Apache >>> NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources >> I'm confused! So the current 10-vc3 vote thread isn't a vote thread?! >> >>> (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most >>> the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries >> Speaking of which, we could do with having a convenience Javadoc >> archive alongside the binaries by actual release day. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Neil >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
