Hi Sathwik, thanks for the pointers.
I've seen on GitHub that you are currently working on the "ode-1.3.x" branch. Should I also do the porting based on that branch or better on the master? Regards, Michael -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. November 2017 14:52 An: dev@ode.apache.org Betreff: Re: Extension activities Hi Hahn, Good to hear about your interest on porting Extension activities onto the trunk. It only exists in APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental" branch. I suppose these should be the initial commits from Tammo, [ODE-159, ODE-160] https://github.com/apache/ode/commit/5ef69232cc6f19cf2818dd1b110416b959297126 https://github.com/apache/ode/commit/1d5fa185a77c944e8d4a708b451611fa74d5c2dc You can just go up the commits if there are more. regards, sathwik On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Michael Hahn <mhahn....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm actually very interested in the support of BPEL extension > activities in ODE and also willing to help to integrate/build the > feature :-) Some years ago I was able to successfully port the > extension activity support from the "APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental" > branch into an ODE 1.3.4 release. > > So, if someone can give me a pointer where to find the most recent > version of the extension activity related classes, I can integrate the > feature into the current trunk and provide the result as a pull > request. Else I can also simply go with the version in the > "APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental" branch as a starting point. > > Regards, > Michael > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sath...@apache.org] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2017 15:53 > An: dev@ode.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Extension activities > > Hi Oliver, > > ODE 2.0 branch was an experimental branch and is not maintained since > a very long time. I will have to revisit it myself, in case it > involves changes to the ODE object model, then we cannot bring it on > any of 1.3.x releases because of chances of breaking binary compatibilities. > > In order to make new features available, we moved towards JSON based > state serialization away from JAVA serialization in the trunk which is > in 1.4 release. > > Currently, we are seeking new committers, you might want to discuss > the feature that you are willing to contribute and probably help us build it. > > regards, > sathwik > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Oliver Kopp <kopp....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > In the context of our usage, we rely on BPEL extension activity > > support within ODE for enabling the invocation of REST APIs through > > a corresponding extension bundle. We therefore ported the extension > > activity support from the 2.0-alpha branch (already some years ago > > and therefore not up to date with "latest" version on GitHub) into > > the current 1.3.7 release build which works. The problem is that by > > changing the source code of the official ODE 1.3.7 release, we have > > to ship our extended version of ODE and take over responsibilities > > regarding licenses, etc. Therefore, it would be really nice if there > > will be an ODE 1.3.x release with integrated extension activity > > support, so that we can use/refer to ODE as it is and as a result > > treat it as a ready to use open source middleware such as Tomcat, we > > just use within our ecosystem. > > > > Do you see any chance to release a corresponding distribution that > > contains extension activity support in the near future? > > > > In return we are really interested in open sourcing our BPEL4REST > > extension bundle so that it can be shipped as a feature with ODE! > > 👨🔧 > > > > Cheers, > > > > Oliver > > > >
