Hi Sathwik, sure, the forked repo is available at: https://github.com/hahnml/ode
Best regards, Michael -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2018 10:34 An: dev@ode.apache.org Betreff: Re: Extension activities Hi Micheal, Thanks for the contribution. Will have a look at it when I get sometime. Can you share your forked repo link? regards, sathwik On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Michael Hahn <mhahn....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sathwik, > > as discussed I created a corresponding PR for porting the extension > activity support (https://github.com/apache/ode/pull/4). > In addition, I added an initial BPEL REST extension activity bundle as > an example together with related test cases in 'bpel-test' project. > > Looking forward to your feedback, let me know if something is missing > or has to be adapted :-) > > Best regards, > Michael > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. November 2017 06:11 > An: dev@ode.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Extension activities > > Micheal, > Am done with porting to trunk. You can start on your PR. > > On Nov 25, 2017 13:17, "Sathwik B P" <sathwik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > MIchael, > > > > Just hold on to making changes for the trunk, am bringing the 1.3.8 > > commits from the release branch to the trunk. I should probably done > > in about 2-3 days. Major library upgrades are coming in. > > > > Just to summarize the changes in the trunk JACOB has been moved into > > a different sub project [https://github.com/apache/ode-jacob], the > > new OModel is here https://github.com/apache/ode/tree/master/bpel-nobj. > > > > The compiler has undergone changes. I believe porting of extension > > activities onto this new model will not be straight forward as the > > extension feature was built on the older OModel. > > > > regards, > > sathwik > > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Sathwik B P <sathwik...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Micheal, > >> > >> I am working towards 1.3.8 release. We cannot bring the extension > >> activity feature on 1.3.x branch > >> > >> On Nov 24, 2017 15:46, "Michael Hahn" <mhahn....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Sathwik, > >>> > >>> thanks for the pointers. > >>> > >>> I've seen on GitHub that you are currently working on the "ode-1.3.x" > >>> branch. > >>> Should I also do the porting based on that branch or better on the > >>> master? > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Michael > >>> > >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik...@gmail.com] > >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. November 2017 14:52 > >>> An: dev@ode.apache.org > >>> Betreff: Re: Extension activities > >>> > >>> Hi Hahn, > >>> > >>> Good to hear about your interest on porting Extension activities > >>> onto the trunk. It only exists in APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental" branch. > >>> > >>> I suppose these should be the initial commits from Tammo, > >>> [ODE-159, ODE-160] > >>> https://github.com/apache/ode/commit/5ef69232cc6f19cf2818dd1 > >>> b110416b959297126 > >>> https://github.com/apache/ode/commit/1d5fa185a77c944e8d4a708 > >>> b451611fa74d5c2dc > >>> > >>> You can just go up the commits if there are more. > >>> > >>> > >>> regards, > >>> sathwik > >>> > >>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Michael Hahn > >>> <mhahn....@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Hi, > >>> > > >>> > I'm actually very interested in the support of BPEL extension > >>> > activities in ODE and also willing to help to integrate/build > >>> > the feature :-) Some years ago I was able to successfully port > >>> > the extension activity support from the "APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental" > >>> > branch into an ODE 1.3.4 release. > >>> > > >>> > So, if someone can give me a pointer where to find the most > >>> > recent version of the extension activity related classes, I can > >>> > integrate the feature into the current trunk and provide the > >>> > result as a pull request. Else I can also simply go with the > >>> > version in the "APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental" branch as a starting point. > >>> > > >>> > Regards, > >>> > Michael > >>> > > >>> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> > Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sath...@apache.org] > >>> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2017 15:53 > >>> > An: dev@ode.apache.org > >>> > Betreff: Re: Extension activities > >>> > > >>> > Hi Oliver, > >>> > > >>> > ODE 2.0 branch was an experimental branch and is not maintained > >>> > since a very long time. I will have to revisit it myself, in > >>> > case it involves changes to the ODE object model, then we cannot > >>> > bring it on any of 1.3.x releases because of chances of breaking > >>> > binary > >>> compatibilities. > >>> > > >>> > In order to make new features available, we moved towards JSON > >>> > based state serialization away from JAVA serialization in the > >>> > trunk which is in 1.4 release. > >>> > > >>> > Currently, we are seeking new committers, you might want to > >>> > discuss the feature that you are willing to contribute and > >>> > probably help us > >>> build it. > >>> > > >>> > regards, > >>> > sathwik > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Oliver Kopp > >>> > <kopp....@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Hi, > >>> > > > >>> > > In the context of our usage, we rely on BPEL extension > >>> > > activity support within ODE for enabling the invocation of > >>> > > REST APIs through a corresponding extension bundle. We > >>> > > therefore ported the extension activity support from the > >>> > > 2.0-alpha branch (already some years ago and therefore not up > >>> > > to date with "latest" version on GitHub) into the current > >>> > > 1.3.7 release build which works. The problem is that by > >>> > > changing the source code of the official ODE 1.3.7 release, we > >>> > > have to ship our extended version of ODE and take over > >>> > > responsibilities regarding licenses, etc. Therefore, it would > >>> > > be really nice if there will be an ODE 1.3.x release with > >>> > > integrated extension activity support, so that we can > >>> > > use/refer to ODE as it is and as a result treat it as a ready > >>> > > to use open source middleware such as > Tomcat, we just use within our ecosystem. > >>> > > > >>> > > Do you see any chance to release a corresponding distribution > >>> > > that contains extension activity support in the near future? > >>> > > > >>> > > In return we are really interested in open sourcing our > >>> > > BPEL4REST extension bundle so that it can be shipped as a > >>> > > feature > with ODE! > >>> > > 👨🔧 > >>> > > > >>> > > Cheers, > >>> > > > >>> > > Oliver > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > > >
