I have no idea what either of you are talking about. Please feel free to elaborate or if they were throw away comments then lets just go ahead and do that.
Regards Scott On 16/03/2010, at 3:43 PM, David E Jones wrote: > > A better way to put it might be rule by man as opposed to rule by law. > > -David > > > On Mar 16, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> David would have said that we have a problem without a requirement :o) >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Sharan-F" <[email protected]> >>> Hi Everyone >>> >>> I agree with Ruth – I'm OK for it to be removed if its causing problems. >>> >>> Do some formal rules exist already around this? If not then what about this >>> as a suggestion? As there has been several misunderstandings related to what >>> can and cant be put on the main page – could the PMC consider putting >>> together some written rules made accessible to the whole community so it can >>> be made crystal clear to anyone interested in putting information on the >>> main OFBiz page. >>> >>> I think it's hard to understand what's required if there's nothing telling >>> you what is and isn't allowed. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Sharan >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r923126-ofbiz-site-index-html-tp1594379p1595410.html >>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
