On 16/03/2010, at 6:58 PM, David E Jones wrote: > > On Mar 16, 2010, at 6:49 PM, Scott Gray wrote: > >> On 16/03/2010, at 6:39 PM, David E Jones wrote: >> >>> I'll admit I empathize with what Sharan is expressing here. It's hard to do >>> stuff, or know how to do stuff and what to do, when there are a bunch of >>> people responding with implied policies or with vetoes for this and that. >> >> Well let's document it so everyone knows what the community policy is. >> Please feel free to comment on the guidelines I proposed elsewhere in this >> thread. >> >> You've quite clearly stepped away from taking an administrative position >> within the community and it would be nice if we didn't spend too much time >> criticizing people who are trying to help fill that void. > > Oh, is that what's happening? I guess I missed that... I didn't even realize > there was an administrative void. Maybe it goes further than that... when I > was the PMC Chair maybe a lot of stuff went on that needed more > "administration" when I didn't think any interference was necessary. Or, > maybe that has nothing to do with the PMC Chair role anyway...
These front page issues are ones that I haven't seen the community have to deal with before so I have no idea how you might have dealt with it back when you were more involved. I wasn't referring to the PMC Chair position as such, more so the general guidance that you used to provide on all things OFBiz and the weight that such guidance carried. If you feel that some of the links posted recently are perfectly acceptable then let's discuss that, otherwise I'm not really sure of the point you're trying to get across. Regards Scott
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
