As long as we all agree I can't see any problems with "rule by man". Actually I
re-thought about our last discussion.
I'm not really interested by Justice as you depicted it (ie rule by law) but I can't stand Injustice, which is not the same thing. A
lot of people died because of Injustice.
BTW Scott, It was more a joke from my side. Because often in such cases David (rightly) outline that somebody is trying to fix a
problem without a requirement.
I guess what David said is that you tried to find a solution the human way (ie
rule by man or maybe we could say consensus)
Jacques
From: "David E Jones" <[email protected]>
A better way to put it might be rule by man as opposed to rule by law.
-David
On Mar 16, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
David would have said that we have a problem without a requirement :o)
Jacques
From: "Sharan-F" <[email protected]>
Hi Everyone
I agree with Ruth – I'm OK for it to be removed if its causing problems.
Do some formal rules exist already around this? If not then what about this
as a suggestion? As there has been several misunderstandings related to what
can and cant be put on the main page – could the PMC consider putting
together some written rules made accessible to the whole community so it can
be made crystal clear to anyone interested in putting information on the
main OFBiz page.
I think it's hard to understand what's required if there's nothing telling
you what is and isn't allowed.
Thanks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r923126-ofbiz-site-index-html-tp1594379p1595410.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
