On Mar 16, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > As long as we all agree I can't see any problems with "rule by man". Actually > I re-thought about our last discussion. > I'm not really interested by Justice as you depicted it (ie rule by law) but > I can't stand Injustice, which is not the same thing. A lot of people died > because of Injustice.
I didn't say there was anything wrong about rule by man (what I think is another matter, and that depends on context). I was just saying that was a better characterization of what Sharan was asking for, ie rule by man versus rule by law and nothing to do with requirements or designs. > BTW Scott, It was more a joke from my side. Because often in such cases David > (rightly) outline that somebody is trying to fix a problem without a > requirement. > I guess what David said is that you tried to find a solution the human way > (ie rule by man or maybe we could say consensus) Actually, I just said what I wrote, and that's it... just introducing alternative terminology. I'll admit I empathize with what Sharan is expressing here. It's hard to do stuff, or know how to do stuff and what to do, when there are a bunch of people responding with implied policies or with vetoes for this and that. -David > From: "David E Jones" <[email protected]> >> A better way to put it might be rule by man as opposed to rule by law. >> >> -David >> >> >> On Mar 16, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>> David would have said that we have a problem without a requirement :o) >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Sharan-F" <[email protected]> >>>> Hi Everyone >>>> >>>> I agree with Ruth – I'm OK for it to be removed if its causing problems. >>>> >>>> Do some formal rules exist already around this? If not then what about >>>> this >>>> as a suggestion? As there has been several misunderstandings related to >>>> what >>>> can and cant be put on the main page – could the PMC consider putting >>>> together some written rules made accessible to the whole community so it >>>> can >>>> be made crystal clear to anyone interested in putting information on the >>>> main OFBiz page. >>>> >>>> I think it's hard to understand what's required if there's nothing telling >>>> you what is and isn't allowed. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Sharan >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r923126-ofbiz-site-index-html-tp1594379p1595410.html >>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> > >
