If we put the full URL in the first line then it might become too long. I
would suggest instead to write the full URL if you want to below the first
line (anywhere you like) and type the first line as Michael suggested.

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I agree with Michael, here and above.
>
> Just a minor favour, not a problem if not possible.
>
> Would it be tolerable to also use https://issues.apache.org/jira
> /browse/OFBIZ-xxxx instead of OFBIZ-xxxx?
> I like to be able to not have to C/P, and rather just click (how many
> times do I during a day?).
> It's not a problem for Atlassian tools, they parse the same.
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
> Le 06/09/2016 à 12:15, Michael Brohl a écrit :
>
>> Ah, I see, misunderstood you intention.
>>
>> I think we can take it as a guideline but at command line and e.g.
>> Eclipse you don't have a character count when committing so that could be a
>> hurdle.
>>
>>
>> Am 06.09.16 um 12:00 schrieb Taher Alkhateeb:
>>
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> I meant a new line after 80 characters. If you review my commit messages
>>> that I usually how I do it (I hit the return key and keep on typing).
>>> Not a
>>> big deal but the output becomes nice on most screens.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Michael Brohl <[email protected]
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Taher,
>>>>
>>>> I would not put a general limit on the length of the commit message.
>>>> There
>>>> are sometimes valuable informations in longer messages I'd like not to
>>>> miss.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 06.09.16 um 11:25 schrieb Taher Alkhateeb:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>> I also suggest to have maximum width of 80 characters. This makes
>>>>> things
>>>>> nicer and cleaner for svn log
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:31 AM, gil portenseigne <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I like the idea to have unified commit message format.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the proposal !
>>>>>> Gil
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/09/2016 10:08, Michael Brohl wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fellow committers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> as you might know, I'm preparing the monthly development details
>>>>>> (mostly
>>>>>> related to Jiras) for our blog at https://blogs.apache.org/ofbiz/.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is currently a lot of manual work (expecially when we have
>>>>>> Community
>>>>>> Days!) mostly because the commit messages I use as the source are not
>>>>>> unified and written in different formats (Jira reference at the
>>>>>> beginning,
>>>>>> among the text or end, different line separators, unnecessary or
>>>>>> doubled
>>>>>> informations like mentioning Jira while also giving the Jira issue
>>>>>> etc.).
>>>>>> Each developer has his/her own style :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to propose a more unified format (or template) for the commit
>>>>>> messages which we can put in the Best Practices part of our Wiki.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My proposal for a unified format would be:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Applied patch for|Implemented|Improved|Fix for|Documentation]: [Jira
>>>>>> title|Free text] [(OFBIZ-xxxx)]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Details:] [More detailed explanation of what has been done and what
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> fix achieves, sideeffects etc.]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Thanks:] [xxxx for ... and yyyy for]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some rules:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * line 1 is mandatory, the following lines are optional
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * line 1: a ":" follows after the kind of implementation/source of
>>>>>> work
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * line 1: the Jira title must not be quoted (""), the Jira reference
>>>>>> should be in parenthesis, no whitespace.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * no separators between the lines, just new lines
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This would help a lot for the preparation of the blog and would also
>>>>>> make
>>>>>> the reading of the commit logs (command line and IDE) much easier,
>>>>>> especially when they are displayed as one-liners.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael Brohl
>>>>>> ecomify GmbH
>>>>>> www.ecomify.de
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to