Just to say: not sure how it happened, but I see this thread as a new thread
with the same subject in Thunderbird.
Jacques
Le 10/09/2016 à 13:32, Pierre Smits a écrit :
I recommend you do that if you feel that need.
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services
OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <[email protected]
wrote:
This is now changing the subject of this thread. I recommend starting a new
thread with your concerns clearly laid out.
On Sep 10, 2016 2:24 PM, "Pierre Smits" <[email protected]> wrote:
I wonder where the respect for the volunteer (spending his precious time,
scratching his itch, improving the product) is, when several PMC members
felt the need to roll over each other *telling* that contributor to
follow
the *rules. *Especially when these rules are not rules, but rather
advice/suggestions that *can* be followed.
Complaining about a suggestion not followed, especially multiple times,
is
clearly a sign of lack of appreciation of the contribution or respect for
the contributor. It is neither improving efficiency*,* but rather
counter-productive.
And what is as bad, is the fact that the persons complaining don't adhere
to their own advice. In stead of addressing their own actions *first* and
addressing unassigned issues *secondly*, they thought they would score
points when they singled out 1 contributor.
That borders on harassment. To put it mildly.
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services
OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]> wrote:
I totally agree with you Taher!
Just allow me a small amendment inline :)
Le 10/09/2016 à 12:35, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
We adhere to these rules out of respect and appreciation to each
other,
not
because of fear of consequences.
We *NORMALLY* adhere to these rules out of respect and appreciation to
each other, not because of fear of consequences.
There are (rare) cases where you need to be OFBiz police, notably with
brands and domains.
I did that in the past and I will continue...
To be complete, I must says these case don't refer to OFBiz specific
rules/policies/etc. but to the ASF guidelines notably
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/domains and globally
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
Most of the time people don't clearly know about these "details" and
act
on good faith. Simply asking them to follow the guidelines is enough.
I think it was a good occasion to expose/remind these ASF
rules/policies
Jacques
Taher Alkhateeb
On Sep 10, 2016 12:19 PM, "Pierre Smits" <[email protected]>
wrote:
A rule - in general - implies, that, when not adhered to, there will
be
consequences. What will those consequences be?
Will the rule police then bitch at the contributor in the same manor
as a
few did, when they felt the need to lecture me about how I prioritise
my
itch?
Food for thought.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services
OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Michael Brohl <
[email protected]>
wrote:
Thanks, Jacopo :-)
Do you think we can apply the template as a general rule?
I will put it in the Wiki then and ask Committers to do their future
commits in this way in case they have not followed this discussions
or
simply forgot. Maybe it will take some time to get used to it.
Thanks,
Michael
Am 10.09.16 um 07:55 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Michael Brohl <
[email protected]
wrote:
...
I've made my last commit using it and also saw that Jacopo (partly
;-)
)
applied this in his latest commits.
I have applied the new template to one commit and then I have
forgotten
to
apply it to the second one and I was hoping you didn't notice it
:-)
I have fixed the commit log now!
Jacopo
Thanks,
Michael
--
Jacques Le Roux
400E Chemin de la Mouline
34560 Poussan
04 67 51 19 38
06 11 79 50 28
